HB 243: Expert Testimony
GENERAL BILL by Metz ; Weinstein ; (CO-INTRODUCERS) Costello ; Gaetz
Expert Testimony; Provides that witness qualified as expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in form of opinion as to facts at issue in case; requires courts to interpret & apply principles of expert testimony in conformity with specified U.S. Supreme Court decisions; subjects pure opinion testimony to such requirements; provides that facts or data that are otherwise inadmissible may not be disclosed to jury by proponent of opinion or inference unless court determines that probative value of facts or data in assisting jury to evaluate expert's opinion substantially outweighs prejudicial effect.
Last Action: 3/9/2012 House - Died in returning Messages
Bill Text: Web Page | PDF
Date Chamber Action 9/29/2011 House • Filed
10/17/2011 House • Referred to Civil Justice Subcommittee; Judiciary Committee -HJ 26
1/9/2012 House • On Committee agenda-- Civil Justice Subcommittee, 01/11/12, 11:30 am, 404 HOB
1/10/2012 House • Introduced -HJ 25
1/11/2012 House • Favorable by Civil Justice Subcommittee; YEAS 11 NAYS 4 -HJ 217
• Now in Judiciary Committee -HJ 217
1/30/2012 House • On Committee agenda-- Judiciary Committee, 02/01/12, 8:30 am, 404 HOB --Temporarily deferred
2/6/2012 House • On Committee agenda-- Judiciary Committee, 02/08/12, 8:30 am, 404 HOB --Retained
2/14/2012 House • On Committee agenda-- Judiciary Committee, 02/16/12, 11:30 am, 404 HOB
2/16/2012 House • Favorable by- Judiciary Committee; YEAS 11 NAYS 5 -HJ 683
• Placed on Calendar -HJ 683
2/21/2012 House • Placed on Special Order Calendar, 02/23/12
2/23/2012 House • Read 2nd time -HJ 792
• Placed on 3rd reading
2/24/2012 House • Read 3rd time -HJ 822
• Amendment(s) failed (438799) -HJ 822
• Passed; YEAS 77 NAYS 34 -HJ 822
2/27/2012 Senate • In Messages
3/5/2012 Senate • Received -SJ 813
• Referred to Judiciary; Budget -SJ 813
3/8/2012 Senate • Withdrawn from Judiciary; Budget -SJ 1064
• Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading -SJ 1064
• Substituted for CS/SB 378 -SJ 1065
• Read 2nd time -SJ 1065
• Amendment(s) adopted (358794) -SJ 1065
• Read 3rd time -SJ 1081
• Passed as amended; YEAS 40 NAYS 0 -SJ 1081
3/8/2012 House • In returning messages
3/9/2012 House • Died in returning Messages
HB 243, Original Filed Version (Current Bill Version) Posted 9/29/2011 at 12:33 PM
Bill Text: Web Page | PDF Analyses: Civil Justice Subcommittee (Post-Meeting) 1/11/2012 (pdf)
Judiciary Committee (Post-Meeting) 2/16/2012 (pdf)
Related Bills (1)
Bill Number Subject Filed By Relationship Last Action and Location Track Bills S 378 (c1) Expert Testimony Richter Similar Last Action: 3/8/2012 S Laid on Table -SJ 1065
Location: Laid on Table
Floor Amendments (3)
Amendment Sponsor Filed Last Floor Action Format 358794 - Amendment (Delete All)
Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
211380 - Amendment to Amendment (358794)
Delete line 44 and insert:
438799 - Amendment
Between lines 60 and 61, insert:
Floor Votes (2)
Date Chamber Result 2/24/2012 2:01 PM House 77 Yeas - 34 Nays 3/8/2012 5:42 PM Senate 40 Yeas - 0 Nays
Citations - Statutes (2)
Citation Catchline Location in Bill Location In Bill Help 90.702 Testimony by experts. Page 1 (pdf) 90.704 Basis of opinion testimony by experts. Page 2 (pdf)
Companion bills that are identical word-for-word, not including titles. However, Resolutions and Concurrent Resolutions are considered identical if the only difference is the word "House" or "Senate."
Companion bills that are substantially similar in text or have substantial portions of text that are largely the same.
Bills that have selected provisions that are similar in text.
A bill that is contingent upon passage of another bill within the same chamber, e.g., a trust fund bill, a bill providing a public record exemption, or an implementing bill.
The page numbers, when listed, for citations are constantly under review. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted as the official documents of the Legislature.
The links for the page numbers are formatted to open the bill text PDF directly to the page containing the citation. However, if your browser is set to open PDFs in a new window, as is often the case with 64-bit browsers, the bill text will open to the first page.