House Bill 2269
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
    Florida House of Representatives - 1999                HB 2269
        By Representative Merchant
  1                      A bill to be entitled
  2         An act relating to planning and budgeting;
  3         creating s. 216.1785, F.S.; providing
  4         requirements for the funding of legislative
  5         projects not recommended by the Governor or a
  6         state agency; providing a contingent effective
  7         date.
  8
  9  Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
10
11         Section 1.  Section 216.1785, Florida Statutes, is
12  created to read:
13         216.1785  Legislative projects not recommended by the
14  Governor or a state agency.--Unless funded as an exceptional
15  project under s. 216.1787, any project proposed by a member of
16  the Legislature that is not recommended by the Governor or a
17  state agency must have a public hearing in both the House of
18  Representatives and the Senate and must meet at least four of
19  the following minimum criteria in order to be funded:
20         (1)  OVERALL PUBLIC BENEFIT.--The project is one for
21  which there is substantial factual evidence that the public at
22  large benefits, as opposed to narrowly defined special
23  interests.
24         (2)  OVERALL STATEWIDE BENEFIT.--The project is one for
25  which there is significant factual evidence that the benefits
26  are primarily of a statewide nature, as opposed to a greater
27  local benefit more suitable for private, nonprofit, or local
28  government funding. Exceptions to this criterion would be
29  projects of local benefit recommended as part of a statewide
30  program utilizing objective criteria to determine project
31
                                  1
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
    Florida House of Representatives - 1999                HB 2269
    513-192A-99
  1  funding or projects of local benefit recommended due to a
  2  serious need or emergency.
  3         (3)  OVERALL FISCAL BENEFIT.--The project is one for
  4  which the potential savings to the state exceed the cost.
  5         (4)  OBJECTIVE EVALUATION.--The project is within or
  6  related to a statewide program and has been properly
  7  evaluated. When funding is based on a formula or some type of
  8  objective review, this would include any project that went
  9  through the review process, was recommended for funding at the
10  level dictated by the formula or review, and was not
11  recommended for funding at the expense of, or at a level
12  greater than, other projects which scored higher on the
13  formula or review.
14         (5)  COMPETITION.--The project is one whose funding
15  would not convey a significant benefit to a specific vendor or
16  vendors without the benefit of a competitive process.
17         (6)  PARTNERSHIP.--The project is appropriately funded
18  as a cooperative effort between the state and other entities,
19  with existing local, private, or nonprofit financial
20  commitment.
21         (7)  PERFORMANCE.--The project is one in which
22  performance data is available and which has met or promoted
23  the promised performance standards.
24         (8)  CONSISTENT TREATMENT OF BENEFICIARIES.--The
25  project is within a statewide program and does not confer the
26  benefits to certain recipients in a manner different than the
27  treatment of other beneficiaries within the same program.
28         Section 2.  This act shall take effect July 1, 1999, if
29  House Bill .... or similar legislation creating s. 216.1787,
30  Florida Statutes, is adopted in the same legislative session
31  or an extension thereof.
                                  2
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
    Florida House of Representatives - 1999                HB 2269
    513-192A-99
  1            *****************************************
  2                          HOUSE SUMMARY
  3
      Requires legislative projects that are not recommended by
  4    the Governor or a state agency to meet certain minimum
      criteria in order to be funded.
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
                                  3