CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.





                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 591, 2nd Eng.

    Amendment No.    

                            CHAMBER ACTION
              Senate                               House
                                   .
                                   .
 1                                 .
                                   .
 2                                 .
                                   .
 3                                 .
                                   .
 4                                                                

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10                                                                

11  Senator Geller moved the following amendment to amendment

12  (453732):

13

14         Senate Amendment 

15         On page 52, line 30, through page 54, line 7, delete

16  those lines

17

18  insert:

19         (c)  Additionally, each MPO shall consider:

20         1.2.  The consistency of transportation planning with

21  applicable federal, state, and local energy conservation

22  programs, goals, and objectives;

23         3.  The need to relieve congestion and prevent

24  congestion from occurring where it does not yet occur;

25         2.4.  The likely effect of transportation policy

26  decisions on land use and development and the consistency of

27  transportation plans and programs with all applicable

28  short-term and long-term land use and development plans;

29         5.  The programming of transportation enhancement

30  activities as required by federal law;

31         6.  The effect of all transportation projects to be

                                  1
    6:32 PM   04/28/99                               h0591.tr29.of




                                                  SENATE AMENDMENT

    Bill No. HB 591, 2nd Eng.

    Amendment No.    





 1  undertaken in the metropolitan area, without regard to whether

 2  such projects are publicly funded;

 3         7.  The provision of access to seaports, airports,

 4  intermodal transportation facilities, major freight

 5  distribution routes, national and state parks, recreation

 6  areas, monuments and historic sites, and military

 7  installations;

 8         8.  The need for roads within the metropolitan area to

 9  efficiently connect with roads outside the metropolitan area;

10         9.  The transportation needs identified through the use

11  of transportation management systems required by federal or

12  state law;

13         3.10.  The preservation of rights-of-way for

14  construction of future transportation projects, including the

15  identification of unused rights-of-way that may be needed for

16  future transportation corridors and the identification of

17  corridors for which action is most needed to prevent

18  destruction or loss;

19         11.  Any available methods to enhance the efficient

20  movement of freight;

21         12.  The use of life-cycle costs in the design and

22  engineering of bridges, tunnels, or pavement;

23         4.13.  The overall social, economic, energy, and

24  environmental effects of transportation decisions; and

25         5.14.  Any Available methods to expand or enhance

26  transit services and increase the use of such services.; and

27

28  (Redesignate subsequent sections.)

29

30

31

                                  2
    6:32 PM   04/28/99                               h0591.tr29.of