| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act relating to public records and public meetings; |
| 3 | amending s. 119.071, F.S.; creating a temporary exemption |
| 4 | from public records requirements for rejected bids and |
| 5 | proposals received by a state agency if the agency |
| 6 | reissues the invitation to bid or request for proposals; |
| 7 | providing for review and repeal; providing a statement of |
| 8 | public necessity; creating a temporary exemption from |
| 9 | public records requirements for a competitive sealed reply |
| 10 | in response to an invitation to negotiate; providing an |
| 11 | extension of the temporary exemption if the agency |
| 12 | reissues the invitation to negotiate; providing for review |
| 13 | and repeal; providing a statement of public necessity; |
| 14 | amending s. 286.0113, F.S.; creating an exemption from |
| 15 | public meetings requirements for a meeting at which |
| 16 | negotiation with a vendor is conducted; requiring a |
| 17 | recording of the meeting; temporarily exempting the |
| 18 | recording from disclosure; providing an extension of the |
| 19 | temporary exemption under specified circumstances; |
| 20 | providing for review and repeal; providing a statement of |
| 21 | public necessity; providing an effective date. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 | Section 1. Paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section |
| 26 | 119.071, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 27 | 119.071 General exemptions from inspection or copying of |
| 28 | public records.-- |
| 29 | (1) AGENCY ADMINISTRATION.-- |
| 30 | (b)1.a. Sealed bids or proposals received by an agency |
| 31 | pursuant to invitations to bid or requests for proposals are |
| 32 | exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State |
| 33 | Constitution until such time as the agency provides notice of a |
| 34 | decision or intended decision pursuant to s. 120.57(3)(a) or |
| 35 | within 10 days after bid or proposal opening, whichever is |
| 36 | earlier. |
| 37 | b. If an agency rejects all bids or proposals submitted in |
| 38 | response to an invitation to bid or request for proposals and |
| 39 | the agency concurrently provides notice of its intent to reissue |
| 40 | the invitation to bid or request for proposals, the rejected |
| 41 | bids or proposals remain exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), |
| 42 | Art. I of the State Constitution until such time as the agency |
| 43 | provides notice of a decision or intended decision pursuant to |
| 44 | s. 120.57(3)(a) concerning the reissued invitation to bid or |
| 45 | request for proposals or until the agency withdraws the reissued |
| 46 | invitation to bid or request for proposals. This sub- |
| 47 | subparagraph is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act |
| 48 | in accordance with s. 119.15 and shall stand repealed on October |
| 49 | 2, 2011, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through |
| 50 | reenactment by the Legislature. |
| 51 | 2.a. A competitive sealed reply in response to an |
| 52 | invitation to negotiate, as defined in s. 287.012, is exempt |
| 53 | from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution |
| 54 | until such time as the agency provides notice of a decision or |
| 55 | intended decision pursuant to s. 120.57(3)(a) or until 20 days |
| 56 | after the final competitive sealed replies are all opened, |
| 57 | whichever occurs earlier. |
| 58 | b. If an agency rejects all competitive sealed replies in |
| 59 | response to an invitation to negotiate and concurrently provides |
| 60 | notice of its intent to reissue the invitation to negotiate and |
| 61 | reissues the invitation to negotiate within 90 days after the |
| 62 | notice of intent to reissue the invitation to negotiate, the |
| 63 | rejected replies remain exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), |
| 64 | Art. I of the State Constitution until such time as the agency |
| 65 | provides notice of a decision or intended decision pursuant to |
| 66 | s. 120.57(3)(a) concerning the reissued invitation to negotiate |
| 67 | or until the agency withdraws the reissued invitation to |
| 68 | negotiate. A competitive sealed reply is not exempt for longer |
| 69 | than 12 months after the initial agency notice rejecting all |
| 70 | replies. |
| 71 | c. This subparagraph is subject to the Open Government |
| 72 | Sunset Review Act in accordance with s. 119.15 and shall stand |
| 73 | repealed on October 2, 2011, unless reviewed and saved from |
| 74 | repeal through reenactment by the Legislature. |
| 75 | Section 2. Section 286.0113, Florida Statutes, is amended |
| 76 | to read: |
| 77 | 286.0113 General exemptions from public meetings.-- |
| 78 | (1) Those portions of any meeting which would reveal a |
| 79 | security system plan or portion thereof made confidential and |
| 80 | exempt by s. 119.071(3)(a) are exempt from the provisions of s. |
| 81 | 286.011 and s. 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution. This |
| 82 | section is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act, in |
| 83 | accordance with s. 119.15, and shall stand repealed on October |
| 84 | 2, 2006, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through |
| 85 | reenactment by the Legislature. |
| 86 | (2)(a) A meeting at which a negotiation with a vendor is |
| 87 | conducted pursuant to s. 287.057(3) is exempt from s. 286.011 |
| 88 | and s. 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution. |
| 89 | (b)1. A complete recording shall be made of any meeting |
| 90 | made exempt in paragraph (a). No portion of the meeting may be |
| 91 | held off the record. |
| 92 | 2. The recording required under subparagraph 1. is exempt |
| 93 | from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution |
| 94 | until such time as the agency provides notice of a decision or |
| 95 | intended decision pursuant to s. 120.57(3)(a) or until 20 days |
| 96 | after the final competitive sealed replies are all opened, |
| 97 | whichever occurs earlier. |
| 98 | 3. If the agency rejects all sealed replies, the recording |
| 99 | remains exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the |
| 100 | State Constitution until such time as the agency provides notice |
| 101 | of a decision or intended decision pursuant to s. 120.57(3)(a) |
| 102 | concerning the reissued invitation to negotiate or until the |
| 103 | agency withdraws the reissued invitation to negotiate. A |
| 104 | recording is not exempt for longer than 12 months after the |
| 105 | initial agency notice rejecting all replies. |
| 106 | (c) This subsection is subject to the Open Government |
| 107 | Sunset Review Act in accordance with s. 119.15 and shall stand |
| 108 | repealed on October 2, 2011, unless reviewed and saved from |
| 109 | repeal through reenactment by the Legislature. |
| 110 | Section 3. (1) The Legislature finds that it is a public |
| 111 | necessity that sealed bids or proposals submitted in response to |
| 112 | an invitation to bid or request for proposals that are rejected |
| 113 | by an agency be made temporarily exempt from public records |
| 114 | requirements if the agency concurrently provides notice of its |
| 115 | intent to reissue the invitation to bid or request for |
| 116 | proposals. Such records shall be made available when the agency |
| 117 | provides notice of a decision or intended decision, as required |
| 118 | under the Administrative Procedure Act, or if the agency |
| 119 | withdraws the reissued invitation to bid or request for |
| 120 | proposals. Temporarily protecting such information ensures that |
| 121 | the process of invitations to bid and requests for proposals |
| 122 | remains economical and equitable, while still preserving |
| 123 | oversight after an agency decision is made. |
| 124 | (2) The Legislature further finds that it is a public |
| 125 | necessity that a competitive sealed reply in response to an |
| 126 | invitation to negotiate be made temporarily exempt from public |
| 127 | records requirements. In addition, a competitive sealed reply in |
| 128 | response to an invitation to negotiate which is rejected by an |
| 129 | agency should be made temporarily exempt from public records |
| 130 | requirements if the agency concurrently provides notice of its |
| 131 | intent to reissue the invitation to negotiate and reissues the |
| 132 | invitation to negotiate within 90 days after the notice of |
| 133 | intent to reissue the invitation to negotiate. Such reply will |
| 134 | be made available when the agency provides notice of a decision |
| 135 | or intended decision, as required under the Administrative |
| 136 | Procedure Act, or if the agency withdraws the reissued |
| 137 | invitation to negotiate. Temporarily protecting such reply |
| 138 | ensures that the process of invitations to negotiate remains |
| 139 | economical and equitable, while still preserving oversight after |
| 140 | an agency decision is made. |
| 141 | (3) Additionally, the Legislature finds that it is a |
| 142 | public necessity that a meeting at which a negotiation with a |
| 143 | vendor is conducted pursuant to s. 287.057(3), Florida Statutes, |
| 144 | be made exempt from public meetings requirements. Protecting |
| 145 | such meetings ensures that the process of invitations to |
| 146 | negotiate remains economical and equitable, while still |
| 147 | preserving oversight after an agency decision is made through |
| 148 | the requirement that a complete recording be made of those |
| 149 | meetings. Furthermore, the recording of that closed portion of |
| 150 | the meeting must be made temporarily exempt from public records |
| 151 | requirements in order to preserve the purpose for the public |
| 152 | meetings exemption. In addition, it is unfair and inequitable to |
| 153 | compel vendors to disclose during the negotiation process the |
| 154 | nature and details of their offers to competitors and to others |
| 155 | beyond the agency. Further, the Legislature finds that such |
| 156 | disclosure impedes full and frank discussion of the strength, |
| 157 | weakness, and value of an offer, thereby limiting the agency's |
| 158 | ability to obtain the best value for the state. The Legislature |
| 159 | also finds that it is unfair and inequitable to publicly discuss |
| 160 | and otherwise disclose negotiation strategies, assessment of |
| 161 | vendors' offers or positions, or the nature or details of |
| 162 | offers. The public and private harm stemming from these |
| 163 | practices outweighs the temporary delay in making meetings and |
| 164 | records related to the negotiation process open to the public. |
| 165 | Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |