| 1 | A bill to be entitled | 
| 2 | An act relating to voting systems; amending s. 20.10, | 
| 3 | F.S., relating to the organizational structure of the | 
| 4 | Department of State; specifying that the Bureau of Voting | 
| 5 | Systems Certification and the Bureau of Voting Systems | 
| 6 | Security are located within the Division of Elections; | 
| 7 | creating s. 101.018, F.S.; creating the Bureau of Voting | 
| 8 | Systems Security for the purpose of ensuring the security | 
| 9 | of voting systems used in the state; specifying the duties | 
| 10 | of the bureau; requiring that the bureau provide a monthly | 
| 11 | report to the director of the Division of Elections and | 
| 12 | the Secretary of State; requiring that any identified | 
| 13 | security problem be remedied within a specified period; | 
| 14 | providing that a manufacturer that fails to remedy a | 
| 15 | security problem is subject to a fine for each day of such | 
| 16 | failure; authorizing the division to adopt emergency rules | 
| 17 | following the failure of a manufacturer to remedy a | 
| 18 | medium-level or high-level security problem which occurs | 
| 19 | proximate to a primary or general election; amending s. | 
| 20 | 101.5606, F.S.; requiring that voting systems approved by | 
| 21 | the Department of State allow the voter to correct an | 
| 22 | error in voting; requiring that such systems produce a | 
| 23 | paper record, be furnished with illumination, be equipped | 
| 24 | with an audio-stimulus voting feature, and include a sip- | 
| 25 | and-puff switch attachment; amending s. 101.5612, F.S.; | 
| 26 | revising the testing requirements for electronic or | 
| 27 | electromechanical voting systems that are configured to | 
| 28 | include electronic or electromechanical tabulation | 
| 29 | devices; requiring that each device be tested; providing | 
| 30 | effective dates. | 
| 31 | 
 | 
| 32 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: | 
| 33 | 
 | 
| 34 | Section 1.  Subsection (2) of section 20.10, Florida | 
| 35 | Statutes, is amended to read: | 
| 36 | 20.10  Department of State.--There is created a Department | 
| 37 | of State. | 
| 38 | (2)  The following divisions of the Department of State are | 
| 39 | established: | 
| 40 | (a)  Division of Elections. | 
| 41 | 1.  Bureau of Voting Systems Certification. | 
| 42 | 2.  Bureau of Voting Systems Security. | 
| 43 | (b)  Division of Historical Resources. | 
| 44 | (c)  Division of Corporations. | 
| 45 | (d)  Division of Library and Information Services. | 
| 46 | (e)  Division of Cultural Affairs. | 
| 47 | (f)  Division of Administration. | 
| 48 | Section 2.  Section 101.018, Florida Statutes, is created | 
| 49 | to read: | 
| 50 | 101.018  Bureau of Voting Systems Security.-- | 
| 51 | (1)  There is created a Bureau of Voting Systems Security | 
| 52 | within the Division of Elections of the Department of State | 
| 53 | which shall be responsible for ensuring the security of the | 
| 54 | voting systems that are certified for use in this state. | 
| 55 | (2)  The bureau shall: | 
| 56 | (a)  Continuously test the hardware and software of the | 
| 57 | voting systems for the purpose of identifying security problems. | 
| 58 | (b)  Test any voting system in response to a credible | 
| 59 | published report of security problems. | 
| 60 | (c)  Notify the manufacturer of the voting system if a | 
| 61 | security problem is identified. | 
| 62 | (d)  Work with the manufacturer of the voting system to | 
| 63 | develop a remedy for the identified security problem. | 
| 64 | (3)  The bureau shall provide a monthly written report to | 
| 65 | the director of the Division of Elections and the Secretary of | 
| 66 | State for each certified voting system which must, at a minimum: | 
| 67 | (a)  Identify each security problem; | 
| 68 | (b)  Identify the source of any potential security breach | 
| 69 | resulting from the problem as "external," such as a security | 
| 70 | breach involving voters, or "internal," such as a security | 
| 71 | breach involving employees of the supervisor of elections, poll | 
| 72 | workers, or manufacturer's field representatives; | 
| 73 | (c)  Detail the scenarios in which the potential threat | 
| 74 | could be realized; | 
| 75 | (d)  Discuss the likelihood of success for each of the | 
| 76 | scenarios; | 
| 77 | (e)  Identify the scope of the potential threat, detailing | 
| 78 | factors such as the number of machines that might be impacted, | 
| 79 | the number of votes that could be affected in a statewide | 
| 80 | election, and the number of counties that could be affected; and | 
| 81 | (f)  Based on paragraphs (a)-(e) and any other relevant | 
| 82 | factors, classify the security threat posed by the problem as | 
| 83 | "high," "medium," or "low." | 
| 84 | (4)(a)  A security problem that is identified in the | 
| 85 | bureau's report must be remedied within 60 days after the | 
| 86 | manufacturer receives notice of the problem or 14 days before | 
| 87 | the next regularly scheduled primary or general election, | 
| 88 | whichever occurs first. A problem shall be considered remedied | 
| 89 | when the bureau so certifies in writing to the division director | 
| 90 | and, in the case of a high threat, to the Secretary of State. | 
| 91 | (b)  Any manufacturer who fails to remedy a security | 
| 92 | problem shall be fined $25,000 per day for each day following | 
| 93 | the period specified in paragraph (a). In addition, if the | 
| 94 | failure to remedy a medium-level or high-level security problem | 
| 95 | is proximate to a scheduled primary or general election, the | 
| 96 | division shall adopt emergency rules to protect the integrity of | 
| 97 | the voting process. | 
| 98 | Section 3.  Effective January 1, 2008, section 101.5606, | 
| 99 | Florida Statutes, is amended to read: | 
| 100 | 101.5606  Requirements for approval of systems.--No | 
| 101 | electronic or electromechanical voting system shall be approved | 
| 102 | by the Department of State unless it is so constructed that: | 
| 103 | (1)  It permits and requires voting in secrecy. | 
| 104 | (2)  It permits each elector to vote at any election for | 
| 105 | all persons and offices for whom and for which the elector is | 
| 106 | lawfully entitled to vote, and no others; to vote for as many | 
| 107 | persons for an office as the elector is entitled to vote for; | 
| 108 | and to vote for or against any question upon which the elector | 
| 109 | is entitled to vote. | 
| 110 | (3)  It immediately rejects a ballot where the number of | 
| 111 | votes for an office or measure exceeds the number which the | 
| 112 | voter is entitled to cast or where the tabulating equipment | 
| 113 | reads the ballot as a ballot with no votes cast. | 
| 114 | (4)  For systems using marksense ballots, it accepts a | 
| 115 | rejected ballot pursuant to subsection (3) if a voter chooses to | 
| 116 | cast the ballot, but records no vote for any office that has | 
| 117 | been overvoted or undervoted. | 
| 118 | (5)  It is capable of correctly counting votes. | 
| 119 | (6)  It permits each voter at a primary election to vote | 
| 120 | only for the candidates seeking nomination by the political | 
| 121 | party in which such voter is registered, for any candidate for | 
| 122 | nonpartisan office, and for any question upon which the voter is | 
| 123 | entitled to vote. | 
| 124 | (7)  At presidential elections it permits each elector, by | 
| 125 | one operation, to vote for all presidential electors of a party | 
| 126 | or for all presidential electors of candidates for President and | 
| 127 | Vice President with no party affiliation. | 
| 128 | (8)  It provides a method for write-in voting. | 
| 129 | (9)  It is capable of accumulating a count of the specific | 
| 130 | number of ballots tallied for a precinct, accumulating total | 
| 131 | votes by candidate for each office, and accumulating total votes | 
| 132 | for and against each question and issue of the ballots tallied | 
| 133 | for a precinct. | 
| 134 | (10)  It is capable of tallying votes from ballots of | 
| 135 | different political parties from the same precinct, in the case | 
| 136 | of a primary election. | 
| 137 | (11)  It is capable of automatically producing precinct | 
| 138 | totals in printed, marked, or punched form, or a combination | 
| 139 | thereof. | 
| 140 | (12)  If it is of a type that whichregisters votes | 
| 141 | electronically, it will permit each voter to privately and | 
| 142 | independently change his or her vote for any candidate or upon | 
| 143 | any question appearing on the official ballot, or correct any | 
| 144 | error, up to the time that the voter takes the final step to | 
| 145 | register his or her vote and to have the vote computed. | 
| 146 | (13)  It is capable of providing records from which the | 
| 147 | operation of the voting system may be audited. | 
| 148 | (14)  It uses a precinct-count tabulation system. | 
| 149 | (15)  It does not use an apparatus or device for the | 
| 150 | piercing of ballots by the voter. | 
| 151 | (16)  It produces and retains a voter-verified permanent | 
| 152 | paper record having a manual audit capacity that records each | 
| 153 | vote to be cast and that is viewed by the voter from behind a | 
| 154 | window or other device before the ballot is cast. | 
| 155 | (17)  It is furnished with illumination sufficient to | 
| 156 | enable the voter to read the ballot while in the booth. | 
| 157 | (18)  It is equipped with an audio-stimulus voting feature | 
| 158 | that communicates the complete content of the ballot in a human | 
| 159 | voice and permits a voter who is blind or visually impaired to | 
| 160 | cast a secret ballot using, at the option of the voter, voice- | 
| 161 | only or tactile-discernible controls. | 
| 162 | (19)  It includes a sip-and-puff switch voting attachment. | 
| 163 | Section 4.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (4) of section | 
| 164 | 101.5612, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: | 
| 165 | 101.5612  Testing of tabulating equipment.-- | 
| 166 | (4)(a)1.  For electronic or electromechanical voting | 
| 167 | systems configured to include electronic or electromechanical | 
| 168 | tabulation devices that whichare distributed to the precincts, | 
| 169 | all or a sample of the devices to be used in the election shall | 
| 170 | be publicly tested. If a sample is to be tested, the sample | 
| 171 | shall consist of a random selection of at least 5 percent of the | 
| 172 | devices for an optical scan system or 2 percent of the devices | 
| 173 | for a touchscreen system or 10 of the devices for either system, | 
| 174 | as applicable, whichever is greater.The test shall be conducted | 
| 175 | by processing a group of ballots, causing the device to output | 
| 176 | results for the ballots processed, and comparing the output of | 
| 177 | results to the results expected for the ballots processed. The | 
| 178 | group of ballots shall be produced so as to record a | 
| 179 | predetermined number of valid votes for each candidate and on | 
| 180 | each measure and to include for each office one or more ballots | 
| 181 | which have activated voting positions in excess of the number | 
| 182 | allowed by law in order to test the ability of the tabulating | 
| 183 | device to reject such votes. | 
| 184 | 2.  If any tested tabulating device is found to have an | 
| 185 | error in tabulation, it shall be deemed unsatisfactory. For each | 
| 186 | device deemed unsatisfactory, the canvassing board shall take | 
| 187 | steps to determine the cause of the error, shall attempt to | 
| 188 | identify and test other devices that could reasonably be | 
| 189 | expected to have the same error, and shall test a number of | 
| 190 | additional devices sufficient to determine that all devices are | 
| 191 | satisfactory.Upon deeming any device unsatisfactory, the | 
| 192 | canvassing board may require all devices to be tested or may | 
| 193 | declare that all devices are unsatisfactory. | 
| 194 | 3.  If the operation or output of any tested tabulation | 
| 195 | device, such as spelling or the order of candidates on a report, | 
| 196 | is in error, such problem shall be reported to the canvassing | 
| 197 | board. The canvassing board shall then determine if the reported | 
| 198 | problem warrants its deeming the device unsatisfactory. | 
| 199 | Section 5.  Except as otherwise expressly provided in this | 
| 200 | act, this act shall take effect July 1, 2006. |