| 1 | The Growth Management Committee recommends the following: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 | Council/Committee Substitute |
| 4 | Remove the entire bill and insert: |
| 5 | A bill to be entitled |
| 6 | An act relating to growth management; amending s. |
| 7 | 163.3177, F.S.; encouraging local governments to adopt |
| 8 | boating facility siting plans; providing criteria and |
| 9 | exemptions for such plans; authorizing assistance for the |
| 10 | development of such plans; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; |
| 11 | conforming a cross-reference; amending s. 197.303, F.S.; |
| 12 | revising the criteria for ad valorem tax deferral for |
| 13 | working waterfront properties; including public lodging |
| 14 | establishments in the description of working waterfront |
| 15 | properties; amending s. 342.07, F.S.; adding recreational |
| 16 | activities as an important state interest; including |
| 17 | public lodging establishments within the definition of the |
| 18 | term "recreational and commercial working waterfront"; |
| 19 | creating s. 373.4132, F.S.; directing water management |
| 20 | district governing boards and the Department of |
| 21 | Environmental Protection to require permits for certain |
| 22 | activities relating to certain dry storage facilities; |
| 23 | providing criteria for application of such permits; |
| 24 | preserving regulatory authority for the department and |
| 25 | governing boards; amending s. 380.06, F.S.; providing for |
| 26 | the state land planning agency to determine the amount of |
| 27 | development that remains to be built in certain |
| 28 | circumstances; specifying certain requirements for a |
| 29 | development order; revising the circumstances in which a |
| 30 | local government may issue permits for development |
| 31 | subsequent to the buildout date; revising the definition |
| 32 | of an essentially built-out development; revising the |
| 33 | criteria under which a proposed change constitutes a |
| 34 | substantial deviation; clarifying the criteria under which |
| 35 | the extension of a buildout date is presumed to create a |
| 36 | substantial deviation; requiring that notice of any change |
| 37 | to certain set-aside areas be submitted to the local |
| 38 | government; requiring that notice of certain changes be |
| 39 | given to the state land planning agency, regional planning |
| 40 | agency, and local government; revising the statutory |
| 41 | exemptions from development-of-regional-impact review for |
| 42 | certain facilities; removing waterport and marina |
| 43 | developments from development-of-regional-impact review; |
| 44 | providing statutory exemptions and partial statutory |
| 45 | exemptions for the development of certain facilities; |
| 46 | providing that the impacts from an exempt use that will be |
| 47 | part of a larger project be included in the development- |
| 48 | of-regional-impact review of the larger project; amending |
| 49 | s. 380.0651, F.S.; revising the statewide guidelines and |
| 50 | standards for development-of-regional-impact review of |
| 51 | office developments; deleting such guidelines and |
| 52 | standards for port facilities; providing such guidelines |
| 53 | and standards for workforce housing; amending s. 380.07, |
| 54 | F.S.; revising the appellate procedures for development |
| 55 | orders within a development of regional impact to the |
| 56 | Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission; amending |
| 57 | s. 380.115, F.S.; providing that a change in a |
| 58 | development-of-regional-impact guideline and standard does |
| 59 | not abridge or modify any vested right or duty under a |
| 60 | development order; providing a process for the rescission |
| 61 | of a development order by the local government in certain |
| 62 | circumstances; providing an exemption for certain |
| 63 | applications for development approval and notices of |
| 64 | proposed changes; amending s. 403.813, F.S.; revising |
| 65 | permitting exceptions for the construction of private |
| 66 | docks in certain waterways; providing an effective date. |
| 67 |
|
| 68 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 69 |
|
| 70 | Section 1. Paragraph (g) of subsection (6) of section |
| 71 | 163.3177, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 72 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
| 73 | plan; studies and surveys.-- |
| 74 | (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)-(5) |
| 75 | and (12), the comprehensive plan shall include the following |
| 76 | elements: |
| 77 | (g)1. For those units of local government identified in s. |
| 78 | 380.24, a coastal management element, appropriately related to |
| 79 | the particular requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) and |
| 80 | meeting the requirements of s. 163.3178(2) and (3). The coastal |
| 81 | management element shall set forth the policies that shall guide |
| 82 | the local government's decisions and program implementation with |
| 83 | respect to the following objectives: |
| 84 | a.1. Maintenance, restoration, and enhancement of the |
| 85 | overall quality of the coastal zone environment, including, but |
| 86 | not limited to, its amenities and aesthetic values. |
| 87 | b.2. Continued existence of viable populations of all |
| 88 | species of wildlife and marine life. |
| 89 | c.3. The orderly and balanced utilization and |
| 90 | preservation, consistent with sound conservation principles, of |
| 91 | all living and nonliving coastal zone resources. |
| 92 | d.4. Avoidance of irreversible and irretrievable loss of |
| 93 | coastal zone resources. |
| 94 | e.5. Ecological planning principles and assumptions to be |
| 95 | used in the determination of suitability and extent of permitted |
| 96 | development. |
| 97 | f.6. Proposed management and regulatory techniques. |
| 98 | g.7. Limitation of public expenditures that subsidize |
| 99 | development in high-hazard coastal areas. |
| 100 | h.8. Protection of human life against the effects of |
| 101 | natural disasters. |
| 102 | i.9. The orderly development, maintenance, and use of |
| 103 | ports identified in s. 403.021(9) to facilitate deepwater |
| 104 | commercial navigation and other related activities. |
| 105 | j.10. Preservation, including sensitive adaptive use of |
| 106 | historic and archaeological resources. |
| 107 | 2. As part of this element, affected local governments are |
| 108 | encouraged to adopt a boating facility siting plan or policy |
| 109 | that includes applicable criteria and considers such factors as |
| 110 | natural resources, manatee protection needs, and recreation and |
| 111 | economic demands as generally outlined in the Boat Facility |
| 112 | Siting Guide dated August 2000 and prepared by the Bureau of |
| 113 | Protected Species Management of the Fish and Wildlife |
| 114 | Conservation Commission. A comprehensive plan that adopts a |
| 115 | boating facility siting plan or policy is exempt from the |
| 116 | provisions of s. 163.3187(1). Local governments that wish to |
| 117 | adopt a boating facility siting plan or policy may be eligible |
| 118 | for assistance with the development of a plan or policy through |
| 119 | the Florida Coastal Management Program. |
| 120 | Section 2. Paragraph (a) of subsection (12) of section |
| 121 | 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 122 | 163.3180 Concurrency.-- |
| 123 | (12) When authorized by a local comprehensive plan, a |
| 124 | multiuse development of regional impact may satisfy the |
| 125 | transportation concurrency requirements of the local |
| 126 | comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency |
| 127 | management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate- |
| 128 | share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic |
| 129 | impacts, if: |
| 130 | (a) The development of regional impact meets or exceeds |
| 131 | the guidelines and standards of s. 380.0651(3)(h)(i) and rule |
| 132 | 28-24.032(2), Florida Administrative Code, and includes a |
| 133 | residential component that contains at least 100 residential |
| 134 | dwelling units or 15 percent of the applicable residential |
| 135 | guideline and standard, whichever is greater; |
| 136 |
|
| 137 | The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any |
| 138 | transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this |
| 139 | subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the |
| 140 | purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate- |
| 141 | share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative |
| 142 | number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach |
| 143 | roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a |
| 144 | stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak |
| 145 | hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from |
| 146 | construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted |
| 147 | level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the |
| 148 | time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to |
| 149 | maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this |
| 150 | subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of |
| 151 | the improvement. |
| 152 | Section 3. Subsection (3) of section 197.303, Florida |
| 153 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 154 | 197.303 Ad valorem tax deferral for recreational and |
| 155 | commercial working waterfront properties.-- |
| 156 | (3) The ordinance shall designate the percentage or amount |
| 157 | of the deferral and the type and location of working waterfront |
| 158 | property, including the type of public lodging establishments, |
| 159 | for which deferrals may be granted, which may include any |
| 160 | property meeting the provisions of s. 342.07(2), which property |
| 161 | may be further required to be located within a particular |
| 162 | geographic area or areas of the county or municipality. |
| 163 | Section 4. Section 342.07, Florida Statutes, is amended to |
| 164 | read: |
| 165 | 342.07 Recreational and commercial working waterfronts; |
| 166 | legislative findings; definitions.-- |
| 167 | (1) The Legislature recognizes that there is an important |
| 168 | state interest in facilitating boating and other recreational |
| 169 | access to the state's navigable waters. This access is vital to |
| 170 | tourists and recreational users and the marine industry in the |
| 171 | state, to maintaining or enhancing the $57 billion economic |
| 172 | impact of tourism and the $14 billion economic impact of boating |
| 173 | in the state annually, and to ensuring continued access to all |
| 174 | residents and visitors to the navigable waters of the state. The |
| 175 | Legislature recognizes that there is an important state interest |
| 176 | in maintaining viable water-dependent support facilities, such |
| 177 | as public lodging establishments and boat hauling and repairing |
| 178 | and commercial fishing facilities, and in maintaining the |
| 179 | availability of public access to the navigable waters of the |
| 180 | state. The Legislature further recognizes that the waterways of |
| 181 | the state are important for engaging in commerce and the |
| 182 | transportation of goods and people upon such waterways and that |
| 183 | such commerce and transportation is not feasible unless there is |
| 184 | access to and from the navigable waters of the state through |
| 185 | recreational and commercial working waterfronts. |
| 186 | (2) As used in this section, the term "recreational and |
| 187 | commercial working waterfront" means a parcel or parcels of real |
| 188 | property that provide access for water-dependent commercial and |
| 189 | recreational activities, including public lodging establishments |
| 190 | as defined in chapter 509, or provide access for the public to |
| 191 | the navigable waters of the state. Recreational and commercial |
| 192 | working waterfronts require direct access to or a location on, |
| 193 | over, or adjacent to a navigable body of water. The term |
| 194 | includes water-dependent facilities that are open to the public |
| 195 | and offer public access by vessels to the waters of the state or |
| 196 | that are support facilities for recreational, commercial, |
| 197 | research, or governmental vessels. These facilities include |
| 198 | docks, wharfs, lifts, wet and dry marinas, boat ramps, boat |
| 199 | hauling and repair facilities, commercial fishing facilities, |
| 200 | boat construction facilities, and other support structures over |
| 201 | the water. As used in this section, the term "vessel" has the |
| 202 | same meaning as in s. 327.02(37). Seaports are excluded from the |
| 203 | definition. |
| 204 | Section 5. Section 373.4132, Florida Statutes, is created |
| 205 | to read: |
| 206 | 373.4132 Dry storage facility permitting.--The governing |
| 207 | board or the department shall require a permit under this part, |
| 208 | including s. 373.4145, for the construction, alteration, |
| 209 | operation, maintenance, abandonment, or removal of a dry storage |
| 210 | facility for 10 or more vessels that is functionally associated |
| 211 | with a boat launching area. As part of an applicant's |
| 212 | demonstration that such a facility will not be harmful to the |
| 213 | water resources and will not be inconsistent with the overall |
| 214 | objectives of the district, the governing board or department |
| 215 | shall require the applicant to provide reasonable assurance that |
| 216 | the secondary impacts from the facility will not cause adverse |
| 217 | impacts to the functions of wetlands and surface waters, |
| 218 | including violations of state water quality standards applicable |
| 219 | to waters as defined in s. 403.031(13), and will meet the public |
| 220 | interest test of s. 373.414(1)(a), including the potential |
| 221 | adverse impacts to manatees. Nothing in this section shall |
| 222 | affect the authority of the governing board or the department to |
| 223 | regulate such secondary impacts under this part for other |
| 224 | regulated activities. |
| 225 | Section 6. Paragraph (d) of subsection (2), paragraphs (a) |
| 226 | and (i) of subsection (4) and subsections (15), (19), and (24) |
| 227 | of section 380.06, Florida Statutes, are amended, and subsection |
| 228 | (28) is added to that section, to read: |
| 229 | 380.06 Developments of regional impact.-- |
| 230 | (2) STATEWIDE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.-- |
| 231 | (d) The guidelines and standards shall be applied as |
| 232 | follows: |
| 233 | 1. Fixed thresholds.-- |
| 234 | a. A development that is below 100 percent of all |
| 235 | numerical thresholds in the guidelines and standards shall not |
| 236 | be required to undergo development-of-regional-impact review. |
| 237 | b. A development that is at or above 120 percent of any |
| 238 | numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development-of- |
| 239 | regional-impact review. |
| 240 | c. Projects certified under s. 403.973 which create at |
| 241 | least 100 jobs and meet the criteria of the Office of Tourism, |
| 242 | Trade, and Economic Development as to their impact on an area's |
| 243 | economy, employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels that |
| 244 | are at or below 100 percent of the numerical thresholds for |
| 245 | industrial plants, industrial parks, distribution, warehousing |
| 246 | or wholesaling facilities, office development or multiuse |
| 247 | projects other than residential, as described in s. |
| 248 | 380.0651(3)(c), (d), and (h)(i), are not required to undergo |
| 249 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
| 250 | 2. Rebuttable presumption.--It shall be presumed that a |
| 251 | development that is at 100 percent or between 100 and 120 |
| 252 | percent of a numerical threshold shall be required to undergo |
| 253 | development-of-regional-impact review. |
| 254 | (4) BINDING LETTER.-- |
| 255 | (a) If any developer is in doubt whether his or her |
| 256 | proposed development must undergo development-of-regional-impact |
| 257 | review under the guidelines and standards, whether his or her |
| 258 | rights have vested pursuant to subsection (20), or whether a |
| 259 | proposed substantial change to a development of regional impact |
| 260 | concerning which rights had previously vested pursuant to |
| 261 | subsection (20) would divest such rights, the developer may |
| 262 | request a determination from the state land planning agency. The |
| 263 | developer or the appropriate local government having |
| 264 | jurisdiction may request that the state land planning agency |
| 265 | determine whether the amount of development that remains to be |
| 266 | built in an approved development of regional impact meets the |
| 267 | criteria of subparagraph (15)(g)3. |
| 268 | (i) In response to an inquiry from a developer or the |
| 269 | appropriate local government having jurisdiction, the state land |
| 270 | planning agency may issue an informal determination in the form |
| 271 | of a clearance letter as to whether a development is required to |
| 272 | undergo development-of-regional-impact review or whether the |
| 273 | amount of development that remains to be built in an approved |
| 274 | development of regional impact meets the criteria of |
| 275 | subparagraph (15)(g)3. A clearance letter may be based solely on |
| 276 | the information provided by the developer, and the state land |
| 277 | planning agency is not required to conduct an investigation of |
| 278 | that information. If any material information provided by the |
| 279 | developer is incomplete or inaccurate, the clearance letter is |
| 280 | not binding upon the state land planning agency. A clearance |
| 281 | letter does not constitute final agency action. |
| 282 | (15) LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT ORDER.-- |
| 283 | (a) The appropriate local government shall render a |
| 284 | decision on the application within 30 days after the hearing |
| 285 | unless an extension is requested by the developer. |
| 286 | (b) When possible, local governments shall issue |
| 287 | development orders concurrently with any other local permits or |
| 288 | development approvals that may be applicable to the proposed |
| 289 | development. |
| 290 | (c) The development order shall include findings of fact |
| 291 | and conclusions of law consistent with subsections (13) and |
| 292 | (14). The development order: |
| 293 | 1. Shall specify the monitoring procedures and the local |
| 294 | official responsible for assuring compliance by the developer |
| 295 | with the development order. |
| 296 | 2. Shall establish compliance dates for the development |
| 297 | order, including a deadline for commencing physical development |
| 298 | and for compliance with conditions of approval or phasing |
| 299 | requirements, and shall include a buildout termination date that |
| 300 | reasonably reflects the time anticipated required to complete |
| 301 | the development. |
| 302 | 3. Shall establish a date until which the local government |
| 303 | agrees that the approved development of regional impact shall |
| 304 | not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or |
| 305 | intensity reduction, unless the local government can demonstrate |
| 306 | that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the |
| 307 | approval of the development order have occurred or the |
| 308 | development order was based on substantially inaccurate |
| 309 | information provided by the developer or that the change is |
| 310 | clearly established by local government to be essential to the |
| 311 | public health, safety, or welfare. The date established pursuant |
| 312 | to this subparagraph shall be no sooner than the buildout date |
| 313 | of the project. |
| 314 | 4. Shall specify the requirements for the biennial report |
| 315 | designated under subsection (18), including the date of |
| 316 | submission, parties to whom the report is submitted, and |
| 317 | contents of the report, based upon the rules adopted by the |
| 318 | state land planning agency. Such rules shall specify the scope |
| 319 | of any additional local requirements that may be necessary for |
| 320 | the report. |
| 321 | 5. May specify the types of changes to the development |
| 322 | which shall require submission for a substantial deviation |
| 323 | determination or a notice of proposed change under subsection |
| 324 | (19). |
| 325 | 6. Shall include a legal description of the property. |
| 326 | (d) Conditions of a development order that require a |
| 327 | developer to contribute land for a public facility or construct, |
| 328 | expand, or pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion |
| 329 | of a public facility, or portion thereof, shall meet the |
| 330 | following criteria: |
| 331 | 1. The need to construct new facilities or add to the |
| 332 | present system of public facilities must be reasonably |
| 333 | attributable to the proposed development. |
| 334 | 2. Any contribution of funds, land, or public facilities |
| 335 | required from the developer shall be comparable to the amount of |
| 336 | funds, land, or public facilities that the state or the local |
| 337 | government would reasonably expect to expend or provide, based |
| 338 | on projected costs of comparable projects, to mitigate the |
| 339 | impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed development. |
| 340 | 3. Any funds or lands contributed must be expressly |
| 341 | designated and used to mitigate impacts reasonably attributable |
| 342 | to the proposed development. |
| 343 | 4. Construction or expansion of a public facility by a |
| 344 | nongovernmental developer as a condition of a development order |
| 345 | to mitigate the impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
| 346 | development is not subject to competitive bidding or competitive |
| 347 | negotiation for selection of a contractor or design professional |
| 348 | for any part of the construction or design unless required by |
| 349 | the local government that issues the development order. |
| 350 | (e)1. Effective July 1, 1986, A local government shall not |
| 351 | include, as a development order condition for a development of |
| 352 | regional impact, any requirement that a developer contribute or |
| 353 | pay for land acquisition or construction or expansion of public |
| 354 | facilities or portions thereof unless the local government has |
| 355 | enacted a local ordinance which requires other development not |
| 356 | subject to this section to contribute its proportionate share of |
| 357 | the funds, land, or public facilities necessary to accommodate |
| 358 | any impacts having a rational nexus to the proposed development, |
| 359 | and the need to construct new facilities or add to the present |
| 360 | system of public facilities must be reasonably attributable to |
| 361 | the proposed development. |
| 362 | 2. A local government shall not approve a development of |
| 363 | regional impact that does not make adequate provision for the |
| 364 | public facilities needed to accommodate the impacts of the |
| 365 | proposed development unless the local government includes in the |
| 366 | development order a commitment by the local government to |
| 367 | provide these facilities consistently with the development |
| 368 | schedule approved in the development order; however, a local |
| 369 | government's failure to meet the requirements of subparagraph 1. |
| 370 | and this subparagraph shall not preclude the issuance of a |
| 371 | development order where adequate provision is made by the |
| 372 | developer for the public facilities needed to accommodate the |
| 373 | impacts of the proposed development. Any funds or lands |
| 374 | contributed by a developer must be expressly designated and used |
| 375 | to accommodate impacts reasonably attributable to the proposed |
| 376 | development. |
| 377 | 3. The Department of Community Affairs and other state and |
| 378 | regional agencies involved in the administration and |
| 379 | implementation of this act shall cooperate and work with units |
| 380 | of local government in preparing and adopting local impact fee |
| 381 | and other contribution ordinances. |
| 382 | (f) Notice of the adoption of a development order or the |
| 383 | subsequent amendments to an adopted development order shall be |
| 384 | recorded by the developer, in accordance with s. 28.222, with |
| 385 | the clerk of the circuit court for each county in which the |
| 386 | development is located. The notice shall include a legal |
| 387 | description of the property covered by the order and shall state |
| 388 | which unit of local government adopted the development order, |
| 389 | the date of adoption, the date of adoption of any amendments to |
| 390 | the development order, the location where the adopted order with |
| 391 | any amendments may be examined, and that the development order |
| 392 | constitutes a land development regulation applicable to the |
| 393 | property. The recording of this notice shall not constitute a |
| 394 | lien, cloud, or encumbrance on real property, or actual or |
| 395 | constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance. |
| 396 | This paragraph applies only to developments initially approved |
| 397 | under this section after July 1, 1980. |
| 398 | (g) A local government shall not issue permits for |
| 399 | development subsequent to the buildout termination date or |
| 400 | expiration date contained in the development order unless: |
| 401 | 1. The proposed development has been evaluated |
| 402 | cumulatively with existing development under the substantial |
| 403 | deviation provisions of subsection (19) subsequent to the |
| 404 | termination or expiration date; |
| 405 | 2. The proposed development is consistent with an |
| 406 | abandonment of development order that has been issued in |
| 407 | accordance with the provisions of subsection (26); or |
| 408 | 3. The development of regional impact is essentially built |
| 409 | out, in that all the mitigation requirements in the development |
| 410 | order have been satisfied, all developers are in compliance with |
| 411 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
| 412 | except the buildout date, and the amount of proposed development |
| 413 | that remains to be built is less than 20 percent of any |
| 414 | applicable development-of-regional-impact threshold; or |
| 415 | 4.3. The project has been determined to be an essentially |
| 416 | built-out development of regional impact through an agreement |
| 417 | executed by the developer, the state land planning agency, and |
| 418 | the local government, in accordance with s. 380.032, which will |
| 419 | establish the terms and conditions under which the development |
| 420 | may be continued. If the project is determined to be essentially |
| 421 | built out built-out, development may proceed pursuant to the s. |
| 422 | 380.032 agreement after the termination or expiration date |
| 423 | contained in the development order without further development- |
| 424 | of-regional-impact review subject to the local government |
| 425 | comprehensive plan and land development regulations or subject |
| 426 | to a modified development-of-regional-impact analysis. As used |
| 427 | in this paragraph, an "essentially built-out" development of |
| 428 | regional impact means: |
| 429 | a. The developers are development is in compliance with |
| 430 | all applicable terms and conditions of the development order |
| 431 | except the buildout built-out date; and |
| 432 | b.(I) The amount of development that remains to be built |
| 433 | is less than the substantial deviation threshold specified in |
| 434 | paragraph (19)(b) for each individual land use category, or, for |
| 435 | a multiuse development, the sum total of all unbuilt land uses |
| 436 | as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation |
| 437 | threshold is equal to or less than 100 percent; or |
| 438 | (II) The state land planning agency and the local |
| 439 | government have agreed in writing that the amount of development |
| 440 | to be built does not create the likelihood of any additional |
| 441 | regional impact not previously reviewed. |
| 442 | (h) The single-family residential portions of a |
| 443 | development may be considered "essentially built out" if all of |
| 444 | the infrastructure and horizontal development have been |
| 445 | completed, at least 50 percent of the dwelling units have been |
| 446 | completed, and more than 80 percent of the lots have been |
| 447 | conveyed to third-party individual lot owners or to individual |
| 448 | builders who own no more than 40 lots at the time of the |
| 449 | determination. |
| 450 | (i) The mobile home park portions of a development may be |
| 451 | considered "essentially built out" if all the infrastructure and |
| 452 | horizontal development has been completed, and at least 50 |
| 453 | percent of the lots are leased to individual mobile home owners. |
| 454 | (j) If the property is annexed by another local |
| 455 | jurisdiction, the annexing jurisdiction shall adopt a new |
| 456 | development order that incorporates all previous rights and |
| 457 | obligations specified in the prior development order. |
| 458 | (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.-- |
| 459 | (a) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
| 460 | development which creates a reasonable likelihood of additional |
| 461 | regional impact, or any type of regional impact created by the |
| 462 | change not previously reviewed by the regional planning agency, |
| 463 | shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall cause the |
| 464 | proposed change development to be subject to further |
| 465 | development-of-regional-impact review. There are a variety of |
| 466 | reasons why a developer may wish to propose changes to an |
| 467 | approved development of regional impact, including changed |
| 468 | market conditions. The procedures set forth in this subsection |
| 469 | are for that purpose. |
| 470 | (b) Any proposed change to a previously approved |
| 471 | development of regional impact or development order condition |
| 472 | which, either individually or cumulatively with other changes, |
| 473 | exceeds any of the following criteria shall constitute a |
| 474 | substantial deviation and shall cause the development to be |
| 475 | subject to further development-of-regional-impact review without |
| 476 | the necessity for a finding of same by the local government: |
| 477 | 1. An increase in the number of parking spaces at an |
| 478 | attraction or recreational facility by 10 5 percent or 330 300 |
| 479 | spaces, whichever is greater, or an increase in the number of |
| 480 | spectators that may be accommodated at such a facility by 10 5 |
| 481 | percent or 1,100 1,000 spectators, whichever is greater. |
| 482 | 2. A new runway, a new terminal facility, a 25-percent |
| 483 | lengthening of an existing runway, or a 25-percent increase in |
| 484 | the number of gates of an existing terminal, but only if the |
| 485 | increase adds at least three additional gates. |
| 486 | 3. An increase in the number of hospital beds by 5 percent |
| 487 | or 60 beds, whichever is greater. |
| 488 | 3.4. An increase in industrial development area by 10 5 |
| 489 | percent or 35 32 acres, whichever is greater. |
| 490 | 4.5. An increase in the average annual acreage mined by 10 |
| 491 | 5 percent or 11 10 acres, whichever is greater, or an increase |
| 492 | in the average daily water consumption by a mining operation by |
| 493 | 10 5 percent or 330,000 300,000 gallons, whichever is greater. |
| 494 | An increase in the size of the mine by 10 5 percent or 825 750 |
| 495 | acres, whichever is less. An increase in the size of a heavy |
| 496 | mineral mine as defined in s. 378.403(7) will only constitute a |
| 497 | substantial deviation if the average annual acreage mined is |
| 498 | more than 550 500 acres and consumes more than 3.3 3 million |
| 499 | gallons of water per day. |
| 500 | 5.6. An increase in land area for office development by 10 |
| 501 | 5 percent or an increase of gross floor area of office |
| 502 | development by 10 5 percent or 66,000 60,000 gross square feet, |
| 503 | whichever is greater. |
| 504 | 7. An increase in the storage capacity for chemical or |
| 505 | petroleum storage facilities by 5 percent, 20,000 barrels, or 7 |
| 506 | million pounds, whichever is greater. |
| 507 | 8. An increase of development at a waterport of wet |
| 508 | storage for 20 watercraft, dry storage for 30 watercraft, or |
| 509 | wet/dry storage for 60 watercraft in an area identified in the |
| 510 | state marina siting plan as an appropriate site for additional |
| 511 | waterport development or a 5-percent increase in watercraft |
| 512 | storage capacity, whichever is greater. |
| 513 | 6.9. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 10 5 |
| 514 | percent or 55 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater. |
| 515 | 7. An increase in the number of dwelling units by 50 |
| 516 | percent or 200 units, whichever is greater, provided that 15 |
| 517 | percent of the increase in the number of dwelling units is |
| 518 | dedicated to the construction of workforce housing. For purposes |
| 519 | of this subparagraph, the term "workforce housing" means housing |
| 520 | that is affordable to a person who earns less than 150 percent |
| 521 | of the area median income. |
| 522 | 8.10. An increase in commercial development by 55,000 |
| 523 | 50,000 square feet of gross floor area or of parking spaces |
| 524 | provided for customers for 330 300 cars or a 10-percent 5- |
| 525 | percent increase of either of these, whichever is greater. |
| 526 | 9.11. An increase in hotel or motel rooms facility units |
| 527 | by 10 5 percent or 83 rooms 75 units, whichever is greater. |
| 528 | 10.12. An increase in a recreational vehicle park area by |
| 529 | 10 5 percent or 110 100 vehicle spaces, whichever is less. |
| 530 | 11.13. A decrease in the area set aside for open space of |
| 531 | 5 percent or 20 acres, whichever is less. |
| 532 | 12.14. A proposed increase to an approved multiuse |
| 533 | development of regional impact where the sum of the increases of |
| 534 | each land use as a percentage of the applicable substantial |
| 535 | deviation criteria is equal to or exceeds 110 100 percent. The |
| 536 | percentage of any decrease in the amount of open space shall be |
| 537 | treated as an increase for purposes of determining when 110 100 |
| 538 | percent has been reached or exceeded. |
| 539 | 13.15. A 15-percent increase in the number of external |
| 540 | vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was |
| 541 | projected during the original development-of-regional-impact |
| 542 | review. |
| 543 | 14.16. Any change which would result in development of any |
| 544 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
| 545 | development approval or in the development order for |
| 546 | preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened |
| 547 | plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened, or |
| 548 | species of special concern and their habitat, any species |
| 549 | protected by 16 U.S.C. s. 668a-668d, primary dunes, or |
| 550 | archaeological and historical sites designated as significant by |
| 551 | the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
| 552 | The further refinement of the boundaries and configuration of |
| 553 | such areas by survey shall be considered under sub-subparagraph |
| 554 | (e)2.j. (e)5.b. |
| 555 |
|
| 556 | The substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs |
| 557 | 3., 5., 8., 9., and 12. 4., 6., 10., 14., excluding residential |
| 558 | uses, and in subparagraph 13. 15., are increased by 100 percent |
| 559 | for a project certified under s. 403.973 which creates jobs and |
| 560 | meets criteria established by the Office of Tourism, Trade, and |
| 561 | Economic Development as to its impact on an area's economy, |
| 562 | employment, and prevailing wage and skill levels. The |
| 563 | substantial deviation numerical standards in subparagraphs 3., |
| 564 | 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 12., and 13. 4., 6., 9., 10., 11., and 14. |
| 565 | are increased by 50 percent for a project located wholly within |
| 566 | an urban infill and redevelopment area designated on the |
| 567 | applicable adopted local comprehensive plan future land use map |
| 568 | and not located within the coastal high hazard area. |
| 569 | (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a development, |
| 570 | or any phase thereof, by more than 7 or more years shall be |
| 571 | presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further |
| 572 | development-of-regional-impact review. An extension of the date |
| 573 | of buildout, or any phase thereof, of more than 5 years or more |
| 574 | but less than 7 years shall be presumed not to create a |
| 575 | substantial deviation. The extension of the date of buildout of |
| 576 | an areawide development of regional impact by more than 5 years |
| 577 | but less than 10 years is presumed not to create a substantial |
| 578 | deviation. These presumptions may be rebutted by clear and |
| 579 | convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
| 580 | government. An extension of 5 years or less than 5 years is not |
| 581 | a substantial deviation. For the purpose of calculating when a |
| 582 | buildout or, phase, or termination date has been exceeded, the |
| 583 | time shall be tolled during the pendency of administrative or |
| 584 | judicial proceedings relating to development permits. Any |
| 585 | extension of the buildout date of a project or a phase thereof |
| 586 | shall automatically extend the commencement date of the project, |
| 587 | the termination date of the development order, the expiration |
| 588 | date of the development of regional impact, and the phases |
| 589 | thereof if applicable by a like period of time. |
| 590 | (d) A change in the plan of development of an approved |
| 591 | development of regional impact resulting from requirements |
| 592 | imposed by the Department of Environmental Protection or any |
| 593 | water management district created by s. 373.069 or any of their |
| 594 | successor agencies or by any appropriate federal regulatory |
| 595 | agency shall be submitted to the local government pursuant to |
| 596 | this subsection. The change shall be presumed not to create a |
| 597 | substantial deviation subject to further development-of- |
| 598 | regional-impact review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear |
| 599 | and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local |
| 600 | government. |
| 601 | (e)1. Except for a development order rendered pursuant to |
| 602 | subsection (22) or subsection (25), a proposed change to a |
| 603 | development order that individually or cumulatively with any |
| 604 | previous change is less than any numerical criterion contained |
| 605 | in subparagraphs (b)1.-15. and does not exceed any other |
| 606 | criterion, or that involves an extension of the buildout date of |
| 607 | a development, or any phase thereof, of less than 5 years is not |
| 608 | subject to the public hearing requirements of subparagraph |
| 609 | (f)3., and is not subject to a determination pursuant to |
| 610 | subparagraph (f)5. Notice of the proposed change shall be made |
| 611 | to the regional planning council and the state land planning |
| 612 | agency. Such notice shall include a description of previous |
| 613 | individual changes made to the development, including changes |
| 614 | previously approved by the local government, and shall include |
| 615 | appropriate amendments to the development order. |
| 616 | 2. The following changes, individually or cumulatively |
| 617 | with any previous changes, are not substantial deviations: |
| 618 | a. Changes in the name of the project, developer, owner, |
| 619 | or monitoring official. |
| 620 | b. Changes to a setback that do not affect noise buffers, |
| 621 | environmental protection or mitigation areas, or archaeological |
| 622 | or historical resources. |
| 623 | c. Changes to minimum lot sizes. |
| 624 | d. Changes in the configuration of internal roads that do |
| 625 | not affect external access points. |
| 626 | e. Changes to the building design or orientation that stay |
| 627 | approximately within the approved area designated for such |
| 628 | building and parking lot, and which do not affect historical |
| 629 | buildings designated as significant by the Division of |
| 630 | Historical Resources of the Department of State. |
| 631 | f. Changes to increase the acreage in the development, |
| 632 | provided that no development is proposed on the acreage to be |
| 633 | added. |
| 634 | g. Changes to eliminate an approved land use, provided |
| 635 | that there are no additional regional impacts. |
| 636 | h. Changes required to conform to permits approved by any |
| 637 | federal, state, or regional permitting agency, provided that |
| 638 | these changes do not create additional regional impacts. |
| 639 | i. Any renovation or redevelopment of development within a |
| 640 | previously approved development of regional impact which does |
| 641 | not change land use or increase density or intensity of use. |
| 642 | j. Changes that modify boundaries and configuration of |
| 643 | areas described in subparagraph (b)14. due to science-based |
| 644 | refinement of such areas by survey, by habitat evaluation, by |
| 645 | other recognized assessment methodology, or by an environmental |
| 646 | assessment. In order for changes to qualify under this sub- |
| 647 | subparagraph, the survey, habitat evaluation, or assessment must |
| 648 | occur prior to the time a conservation easement protecting such |
| 649 | lands is recorded and must not result in any net decrease in the |
| 650 | total acreage of the lands specifically set aside for permanent |
| 651 | preservation in the final development order. |
| 652 | k.j. Any other change which the state land planning agency |
| 653 | agrees in writing is similar in nature, impact, or character to |
| 654 | the changes enumerated in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. a.-i. and |
| 655 | which does not create the likelihood of any additional regional |
| 656 | impact. |
| 657 |
|
| 658 | This subsection does not require the filing of a notice of |
| 659 | proposed change but shall require an application to the local |
| 660 | government to amend the development order in accordance with the |
| 661 | local government's procedures for amendment of a development |
| 662 | order. In accordance with the local government's procedures, |
| 663 | including requirements for notice to the applicant and the |
| 664 | public, the local government shall either deny the application |
| 665 | for amendment or adopt an amendment to the development order |
| 666 | which approves the application with or without conditions. |
| 667 | Following adoption, the local government shall render to the |
| 668 | state land planning agency the amendment to the development |
| 669 | order. The state land planning agency may appeal, pursuant to s. |
| 670 | 380.07(3), the amendment to the development order if the |
| 671 | amendment involves sub-subparagraph g., sub-subparagraph h., |
| 672 | sub-subparagraph j., or sub-subparagraph k. and it believes the |
| 673 | change creates a reasonable likelihood of new or additional |
| 674 | regional impacts a development order amendment for any change |
| 675 | listed in sub-subparagraphs a.-j. unless such issue is addressed |
| 676 | either in the existing development order or in the application |
| 677 | for development approval, but, in the case of the application, |
| 678 | only if, and in the manner in which, the application is |
| 679 | incorporated in the development order. |
| 680 | 3. Except for the change authorized by sub-subparagraph |
| 681 | 2.f., any addition of land not previously reviewed or any change |
| 682 | not specified in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) shall be |
| 683 | presumed to create a substantial deviation. This presumption may |
| 684 | be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. |
| 685 | 4. Any submittal of a proposed change to a previously |
| 686 | approved development shall include a description of individual |
| 687 | changes previously made to the development, including changes |
| 688 | previously approved by the local government. The local |
| 689 | government shall consider the previous and current proposed |
| 690 | changes in deciding whether such changes cumulatively constitute |
| 691 | a substantial deviation requiring further development-of- |
| 692 | regional-impact review. |
| 693 | 5. The following changes to an approved development of |
| 694 | regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial |
| 695 | deviation. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and |
| 696 | convincing evidence. |
| 697 | a. A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the acreage |
| 698 | to a land use not previously approved in the development order. |
| 699 | Changes of less than 15 percent shall be presumed not to create |
| 700 | a substantial deviation. |
| 701 | b. Except for the types of uses listed in subparagraph |
| 702 | (b)16., any change which would result in the development of any |
| 703 | area which was specifically set aside in the application for |
| 704 | development approval or in the development order for |
| 705 | preservation, buffers, or special protection, including habitat |
| 706 | for plant and animal species, archaeological and historical |
| 707 | sites, dunes, and other special areas. |
| 708 | b.c. Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the |
| 709 | contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases |
| 710 | and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized |
| 711 | multiuse development of regional impact which was originally |
| 712 | approved with three or more uses specified in s. 380.0651(3)(c), |
| 713 | (d), (f), and (g) and residential use. |
| 714 | (f)1. The state land planning agency shall establish by |
| 715 | rule standard forms for submittal of proposed changes to a |
| 716 | previously approved development of regional impact which may |
| 717 | require further development-of-regional-impact review. At a |
| 718 | minimum, the standard form shall require the developer to |
| 719 | provide the precise language that the developer proposes to |
| 720 | delete or add as an amendment to the development order. |
| 721 | 2. The developer shall submit, simultaneously, to the |
| 722 | local government, the regional planning agency, and the state |
| 723 | land planning agency the request for approval of a proposed |
| 724 | change. |
| 725 | 3. No sooner than 30 days but no later than 45 days after |
| 726 | submittal by the developer to the local government, the state |
| 727 | land planning agency, and the appropriate regional planning |
| 728 | agency, the local government shall give 15 days' notice and |
| 729 | schedule a public hearing to consider the change that the |
| 730 | developer asserts does not create a substantial deviation. This |
| 731 | public hearing shall be held within 60 90 days after submittal |
| 732 | of the proposed changes, unless that time is extended by the |
| 733 | developer. |
| 734 | 4. The appropriate regional planning agency or the state |
| 735 | land planning agency shall review the proposed change and, no |
| 736 | later than 45 days after submittal by the developer of the |
| 737 | proposed change, unless that time is extended by the developer, |
| 738 | and prior to the public hearing at which the proposed change is |
| 739 | to be considered, shall advise the local government in writing |
| 740 | whether it objects to the proposed change, shall specify the |
| 741 | reasons for its objection, if any, and shall provide a copy to |
| 742 | the developer. |
| 743 | 5. At the public hearing, the local government shall |
| 744 | determine whether the proposed change requires further |
| 745 | development-of-regional-impact review. The provisions of |
| 746 | paragraphs (a) and (e), the thresholds set forth in paragraph |
| 747 | (b), and the presumptions set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) |
| 748 | and subparagraph (e)3. shall be applicable in determining |
| 749 | whether further development-of-regional-impact review is |
| 750 | required. |
| 751 | 6. If the local government determines that the proposed |
| 752 | change does not require further development-of-regional-impact |
| 753 | review and is otherwise approved, or if the proposed change is |
| 754 | not subject to a hearing and determination pursuant to |
| 755 | subparagraphs 3. and 5. and is otherwise approved, the local |
| 756 | government shall issue an amendment to the development order |
| 757 | incorporating the approved change and conditions of approval |
| 758 | relating to the change. The decision of the local government to |
| 759 | approve, with or without conditions, or to deny the proposed |
| 760 | change that the developer asserts does not require further |
| 761 | review shall be subject to the appeal provisions of s. 380.07. |
| 762 | However, the state land planning agency may not appeal the local |
| 763 | government decision if it did not comply with subparagraph 4. |
| 764 | The state land planning agency may not appeal a change to a |
| 765 | development order made pursuant to subparagraph (e)1. or |
| 766 | subparagraph (e)2. for developments of regional impact approved |
| 767 | after January 1, 1980, unless the change would result in a |
| 768 | significant impact to a regionally significant archaeological, |
| 769 | historical, or natural resource not previously identified in the |
| 770 | original development-of-regional-impact review. |
| 771 | (g) If a proposed change requires further development-of- |
| 772 | regional-impact review pursuant to this section, the review |
| 773 | shall be conducted subject to the following additional |
| 774 | conditions: |
| 775 | 1. The development-of-regional-impact review conducted by |
| 776 | the appropriate regional planning agency shall address only |
| 777 | those issues raised by the proposed change except as provided in |
| 778 | subparagraph 2. |
| 779 | 2. The regional planning agency shall consider, and the |
| 780 | local government shall determine whether to approve, approve |
| 781 | with conditions, or deny the proposed change as it relates to |
| 782 | the entire development. If the local government determines that |
| 783 | the proposed change, as it relates to the entire development, is |
| 784 | unacceptable, the local government shall deny the change. |
| 785 | 3. If the local government determines that the proposed |
| 786 | change, as it relates to the entire development, should be |
| 787 | approved, any new conditions in the amendment to the development |
| 788 | order issued by the local government shall address only those |
| 789 | issues raised by the proposed change and require mitigation only |
| 790 | for the individual and cumulative impacts of the proposed |
| 791 | change. |
| 792 | 4. Development within the previously approved development |
| 793 | of regional impact may continue, as approved, during the |
| 794 | development-of-regional-impact review in those portions of the |
| 795 | development which are not directly affected by the proposed |
| 796 | change. |
| 797 | (h) When further development-of-regional-impact review is |
| 798 | required because a substantial deviation has been determined or |
| 799 | admitted by the developer, the amendment to the development |
| 800 | order issued by the local government shall be consistent with |
| 801 | the requirements of subsection (15) and shall be subject to the |
| 802 | hearing and appeal provisions of s. 380.07. The state land |
| 803 | planning agency or the appropriate regional planning agency need |
| 804 | not participate at the local hearing in order to appeal a local |
| 805 | government development order issued pursuant to this paragraph. |
| 806 | (i) An increase in the number of residential dwelling |
| 807 | units shall not constitute a substantial deviation and shall not |
| 808 | be subject to development-of-regional-impact review for |
| 809 | additional impacts provided that all the residential dwelling |
| 810 | units are dedicated to workforce housing. For purposes of this |
| 811 | paragraph, the term "workforce housing" means housing that is |
| 812 | affordable to a person who earns less than 150 percent of the |
| 813 | area median income. |
| 814 | (24) STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
| 815 | (a) Any proposed hospital which has a designed capacity of |
| 816 | not more than 100 beds is exempt from the provisions of this |
| 817 | section. |
| 818 | (b) Any proposed electrical transmission line or |
| 819 | electrical power plant is exempt from the provisions of this |
| 820 | section, except any steam or solar electrical generating |
| 821 | facility of less than 50 megawatts in capacity attached to a |
| 822 | development of regional impact. |
| 823 | (c) Any proposed addition to an existing sports facility |
| 824 | complex is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
| 825 | addition meets the following characteristics: |
| 826 | 1. It would not operate concurrently with the scheduled |
| 827 | hours of operation of the existing facility. |
| 828 | 2. Its seating capacity would be no more than 75 percent |
| 829 | of the capacity of the existing facility. |
| 830 | 3. The sports facility complex property is owned by a |
| 831 | public body prior to July 1, 1983. |
| 832 |
|
| 833 | This exemption does not apply to any pari-mutuel facility. |
| 834 | (d) Any proposed addition or cumulative additions |
| 835 | subsequent to July 1, 1988, to an existing sports facility |
| 836 | complex owned by a state university is exempt if the increased |
| 837 | seating capacity of the complex is no more than 30 percent of |
| 838 | the capacity of the existing facility. |
| 839 | (e) Any addition of permanent seats or parking spaces for |
| 840 | an existing sports facility located on property owned by a |
| 841 | public body prior to July 1, 1973, is exempt from the provisions |
| 842 | of this section if future additions do not expand existing |
| 843 | permanent seating or parking capacity more than 15 percent |
| 844 | annually in excess of the prior year's capacity. |
| 845 | (f) Any increase in the seating capacity of an existing |
| 846 | sports facility having a permanent seating capacity of at least |
| 847 | 50,000 spectators is exempt from the provisions of this section, |
| 848 | provided that such an increase does not increase permanent |
| 849 | seating capacity by more than 5 percent per year and not to |
| 850 | exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year period, and provided |
| 851 | that the sports facility notifies the appropriate local |
| 852 | government within which the facility is located of the increase |
| 853 | at least 6 months prior to the initial use of the increased |
| 854 | seating, in order to permit the appropriate local government to |
| 855 | develop a traffic management plan for the traffic generated by |
| 856 | the increase. Any traffic management plan shall be consistent |
| 857 | with the local comprehensive plan, the regional policy plan, and |
| 858 | the state comprehensive plan. |
| 859 | (g) Any expansion in the permanent seating capacity or |
| 860 | additional improved parking facilities of an existing sports |
| 861 | facility is exempt from the provisions of this section, if the |
| 862 | following conditions exist: |
| 863 | 1.a. The sports facility had a permanent seating capacity |
| 864 | on January 1, 1991, of at least 41,000 spectator seats; |
| 865 | b. The sum of such expansions in permanent seating |
| 866 | capacity does not exceed a total of 10 percent in any 5-year |
| 867 | period and does not exceed a cumulative total of 20 percent for |
| 868 | any such expansions; or |
| 869 | c. The increase in additional improved parking facilities |
| 870 | is a one-time addition and does not exceed 3,500 parking spaces |
| 871 | serving the sports facility; and |
| 872 | 2. The local government having jurisdiction of the sports |
| 873 | facility includes in the development order or development permit |
| 874 | approving such expansion under this paragraph a finding of fact |
| 875 | that the proposed expansion is consistent with the |
| 876 | transportation, water, sewer and stormwater drainage provisions |
| 877 | of the approved local comprehensive plan and local land |
| 878 | development regulations relating to those provisions. |
| 879 |
|
| 880 | Any owner or developer who intends to rely on this statutory |
| 881 | exemption shall provide to the department a copy of the local |
| 882 | government application for a development permit. Within 45 days |
| 883 | of receipt of the application, the department shall render to |
| 884 | the local government an advisory and nonbinding opinion, in |
| 885 | writing, stating whether, in the department's opinion, the |
| 886 | prescribed conditions exist for an exemption under this |
| 887 | paragraph. The local government shall render the development |
| 888 | order approving each such expansion to the department. The |
| 889 | owner, developer, or department may appeal the local government |
| 890 | development order pursuant to s. 380.07, within 45 days after |
| 891 | the order is rendered. The scope of review shall be limited to |
| 892 | the determination of whether the conditions prescribed in this |
| 893 | paragraph exist. If any sports facility expansion undergoes |
| 894 | development of regional impact review, all previous expansions |
| 895 | which were exempt under this paragraph shall be included in the |
| 896 | development of regional impact review. |
| 897 | (h) Expansion to port harbors, spoil disposal sites, |
| 898 | navigation channels, turning basins, harbor berths, and other |
| 899 | related inwater harbor facilities of ports listed in s. |
| 900 | 403.021(9)(b), port transportation facilities and projects |
| 901 | listed in s. 311.07(3)(b), and intermodal transportation |
| 902 | facilities identified pursuant to s. 311.09(3) are exempt from |
| 903 | the provisions of this section when such expansions, projects, |
| 904 | or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans |
| 905 | that are in compliance with the provisions of s. 163.3178. |
| 906 | (i) Any proposed facility for the storage of any petroleum |
| 907 | product or any expansion of an existing facility is exempt from |
| 908 | the provisions of this section, if the facility is consistent |
| 909 | with a local comprehensive plan that is in compliance with s. |
| 910 | 163.3177 or is consistent with a comprehensive port master plan |
| 911 | that is in compliance with s. 163.3178. |
| 912 | (j) Any renovation or redevelopment within the same land |
| 913 | parcel which does not change land use or increase density or |
| 914 | intensity of use. |
| 915 | (k)1. Waterport and marina development, including dry |
| 916 | storage facilities, are exempt from the provisions of this |
| 917 | section Any waterport or marina development is exempt from the |
| 918 | provisions of this section if the relevant county or |
| 919 | municipality has adopted a boating facility siting plan or |
| 920 | policy which includes applicable criteria, considering such |
| 921 | factors as natural resources, manatee protection needs and |
| 922 | recreation and economic demands as generally outlined in the |
| 923 | Bureau of Protected Species Management Boat Facility Siting |
| 924 | Guide, dated August 2000, into the coastal management or land |
| 925 | use element of its comprehensive plan. The adoption of boating |
| 926 | facility siting plans or policies into the comprehensive plan is |
| 927 | exempt from the provisions of s. 163.3187(1). Any waterport or |
| 928 | marina development within the municipalities or counties with |
| 929 | boating facility siting plans or policies that meet the above |
| 930 | criteria, adopted prior to April 1, 2002, are exempt from the |
| 931 | provisions of this section, when their boating facility siting |
| 932 | plan or policy is adopted as part of the relevant local |
| 933 | government's comprehensive plan. |
| 934 | 2. Within 6 months of the effective date of this law, The |
| 935 | Department of Community Affairs, in conjunction with the |
| 936 | Department of Environmental Protection and the Florida Fish and |
| 937 | Wildlife Conservation Commission, shall provide technical |
| 938 | assistance and guidelines, including model plans, policies and |
| 939 | criteria to local governments for the development of their |
| 940 | siting plans. |
| 941 | (l) Any proposed development within an urban service |
| 942 | boundary established under s. 163.3177(14) is exempt from the |
| 943 | provisions of this section if the local government having |
| 944 | jurisdiction over the area where the development is proposed has |
| 945 | adopted the urban service boundary, and has entered into a |
| 946 | binding agreement with adjacent jurisdictions that would be |
| 947 | impacted and with the Department of Transportation regarding the |
| 948 | mitigation of impacts on state and regional transportation |
| 949 | facilities, and has adopted a proportionate share methodology |
| 950 | pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
| 951 | (m) Any proposed development within a rural land |
| 952 | stewardship area created under s. 163.3177(11)(d) is exempt from |
| 953 | the provisions of this section if the local government that has |
| 954 | adopted the rural land stewardship area has entered into a |
| 955 | binding agreement with jurisdictions that would be impacted and |
| 956 | the Department of Transportation regarding the mitigation of |
| 957 | impacts on state and regional transportation facilities, and has |
| 958 | adopted a proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. |
| 959 | 163.3180(16). |
| 960 | (n) Any proposed development or redevelopment within an |
| 961 | area designated as an urban infill and redevelopment area under |
| 962 | s. 163.2517 is exempt from the provisions of this section if the |
| 963 | local government has entered into a binding agreement with |
| 964 | jurisdictions that would be impacted and the Department of |
| 965 | Transportation regarding the mitigation of impacts on state and |
| 966 | regional transportation facilities, and has adopted a |
| 967 | proportionate share methodology pursuant to s. 163.3180(16). |
| 968 | (o) The establishment, relocation, or expansion of any |
| 969 | military installation as defined in s. 163.3175, is exempt from |
| 970 | this section. |
| 971 | (p) Any self-storage warehousing that does not allow |
| 972 | retail or other services is exempt from this section. |
| 973 | (q) Any proposed nursing home or assisted living facility |
| 974 | is exempt from this section. |
| 975 | (r) Any development identified in an airport master plan |
| 976 | and adopted into the comprehensive plan pursuant to s. |
| 977 | 163.3177(6)(k) is exempt from this section. |
| 978 | (s) Any development identified in a campus master plan and |
| 979 | adopted pursuant to s. 1013.30 is exempt from this section. |
| 980 | (t) Any development in a specific area plan which is |
| 981 | prepared pursuant to s. 163.3245 and adopted into the |
| 982 | comprehensive plan is exempt from this section. |
| 983 |
|
| 984 | If a use is exempt from review as a development of regional |
| 985 | impact under paragraphs (a)-(t) but will be part of a larger |
| 986 | project that is subject to review as a development of regional |
| 987 | impact, the impact of the exempt use must be included in the |
| 988 | review of the larger project. |
| 989 | (28) PARTIAL STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS.-- |
| 990 | (a) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
| 991 | (24)(l) for urban service boundaries is not entered into within |
| 992 | 12 months after establishment of the urban service boundary, the |
| 993 | development-of-regional-impact review for projects within the |
| 994 | urban service boundary must address transportation impacts only. |
| 995 | (b) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
| 996 | (24)(m) for rural land stewardship areas is not entered into |
| 997 | within 12 months after the designation of a rural land |
| 998 | stewardship area, the development-of-regional-impact review for |
| 999 | projects within the rural land stewardship area must address |
| 1000 | transportation impacts only. |
| 1001 | (c) If the binding agreement referenced under paragraph |
| 1002 | (24)(n) for designated urban infill and redevelopment areas is |
| 1003 | not entered into within 12 months after the designation of the |
| 1004 | area or July 1, 2007, whichever occurs later, the development- |
| 1005 | of-regional-impact review for projects within the urban infill |
| 1006 | and redevelopment area must address transportation impacts only. |
| 1007 | (d) A local government that does not wish to enter into a |
| 1008 | binding agreement or that is unable to agree on the terms of the |
| 1009 | agreement referenced under paragraph (24)(l), paragraph (24)(m), |
| 1010 | or paragraph (24)(n) shall provide written notification to the |
| 1011 | state land planning agency of the decision to not enter into a |
| 1012 | binding agreement or the failure to enter into a binding |
| 1013 | agreement within the 12-month period referenced in paragraphs |
| 1014 | (a), (b) and (c). Following the notification of the state land |
| 1015 | planning agency, development-of-regional-impact review for |
| 1016 | projects within an urban service boundary under paragraph |
| 1017 | (24)(l), a rural land stewardship area under paragraph (24)(m), |
| 1018 | or an urban infill and redevelopment area under paragraph |
| 1019 | (24)(n), must address transportation impacts only. |
| 1020 | Section 7. Paragraphs (d) and (e) of subsection (3) of |
| 1021 | section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, are amended, paragraphs (f) |
| 1022 | through (j) are redesignated as (e) through (i), respectively, |
| 1023 | and a new paragraph (j) is added to that subsection, to read: |
| 1024 | 380.0651 Statewide guidelines and standards.-- |
| 1025 | (3) The following statewide guidelines and standards shall |
| 1026 | be applied in the manner described in s. 380.06(2) to determine |
| 1027 | whether the following developments shall be required to undergo |
| 1028 | development-of-regional-impact review: |
| 1029 | (d) Office development.--Any proposed office building or |
| 1030 | park operated under common ownership, development plan, or |
| 1031 | management that: |
| 1032 | 1. Encompasses 300,000 or more square feet of gross floor |
| 1033 | area; or |
| 1034 | 2. Encompasses more than 600,000 square feet of gross |
| 1035 | floor area in a county with a population greater than 500,000 |
| 1036 | and only in a geographic area specifically designated as highly |
| 1037 | suitable for increased threshold intensity in the approved local |
| 1038 | comprehensive plan and in the strategic regional policy plan. |
| 1039 | (e) Port facilities.--The proposed construction of any |
| 1040 | waterport or marina is required to undergo |
| 1041 | development-of-regional-impact review, except one designed for: |
| 1042 | 1.a. The wet storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
| 1043 | watercraft used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial |
| 1044 | fishing, or |
| 1045 | b. The dry storage of fewer than 200 watercraft used |
| 1046 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing, or |
| 1047 | c. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 150 |
| 1048 | watercraft on or adjacent to an inland freshwater lake except |
| 1049 | Lake Okeechobee or any lake which has been designated an |
| 1050 | Outstanding Florida Water, or |
| 1051 | d. The wet or dry storage or mooring of fewer than 50 |
| 1052 | watercraft of 40 feet in length or less of any type or purpose. |
| 1053 | The exceptions to this paragraph's requirements for development- |
| 1054 | of-regional-impact review shall not apply to any waterport or |
| 1055 | marina facility located within or which serves physical |
| 1056 | development located within a coastal barrier resource unit on an |
| 1057 | unbridged barrier island designated pursuant to 16 U.S.C. s. |
| 1058 | 3501. |
| 1059 |
|
| 1060 | In addition to the foregoing, for projects for which no |
| 1061 | environmental resource permit or sovereign submerged land lease |
| 1062 | is required, the Department of Environmental Protection must |
| 1063 | determine in writing that a proposed marina in excess of 10 |
| 1064 | slips or storage spaces or a combination of the two is located |
| 1065 | so that it will not adversely impact Outstanding Florida Waters |
| 1066 | or Class II waters and will not contribute boat traffic in a |
| 1067 | manner that will have an adverse impact on an area known to be, |
| 1068 | or likely to be, frequented by manatees. If the Department of |
| 1069 | Environmental Protection fails to issue its determination within |
| 1070 | 45 days of receipt of a formal written request, it has waived |
| 1071 | its authority to make such determination. The Department of |
| 1072 | Environmental Protection determination shall constitute final |
| 1073 | agency action pursuant to chapter 120. |
| 1074 | 2. The dry storage of fewer than 300 watercraft used |
| 1075 | exclusively for sport, pleasure, or commercial fishing at a |
| 1076 | marina constructed and in operation prior to July 1, 1985. |
| 1077 | 3. Any proposed marina development with both wet and dry |
| 1078 | mooring or storage used exclusively for sport, pleasure, or |
| 1079 | commercial fishing, where the sum of percentages of the |
| 1080 | applicable wet and dry mooring or storage thresholds equals 100 |
| 1081 | percent. This threshold is in addition to, and does not |
| 1082 | preclude, a development from being required to undergo |
| 1083 | development-of-regional-impact review under sub-subparagraphs |
| 1084 | 1.a. and b. and subparagraph 2. |
| 1085 | (j) Workforce housing.--The applicable guidelines for |
| 1086 | residential development and the residential component for |
| 1087 | multiuse development shall be increased by 50 percent where the |
| 1088 | developer demonstrates that at least 15 percent of the |
| 1089 | residential dwelling units will be dedicated to workforce |
| 1090 | housing. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "workforce |
| 1091 | housing" means housing that is affordable to a person who earns |
| 1092 | less than 150 percent of the area median income. |
| 1093 | Section 8. Section 380.07, Florida Statutes, is amended to |
| 1094 | read: |
| 1095 | 380.07 Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission.-- |
| 1096 | (1) There is hereby created the Florida Land and Water |
| 1097 | Adjudicatory Commission, which shall consist of the |
| 1098 | Administration Commission. The commission may adopt rules |
| 1099 | necessary to ensure compliance with the area of critical state |
| 1100 | concern program and the requirements for developments of |
| 1101 | regional impact as set forth in this chapter. |
| 1102 | (2) Whenever any local government issues any development |
| 1103 | order in any area of critical state concern, or in regard to any |
| 1104 | development of regional impact, copies of such orders as |
| 1105 | prescribed by rule by the state land planning agency shall be |
| 1106 | transmitted to the state land planning agency, the regional |
| 1107 | planning agency, and the owner or developer of the property |
| 1108 | affected by such order. The state land planning agency shall |
| 1109 | adopt rules describing development order rendition and |
| 1110 | effectiveness in designated areas of critical state concern. |
| 1111 | Within 45 days after the order is rendered, the owner, the |
| 1112 | developer, or the state land planning agency may appeal the |
| 1113 | order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission by |
| 1114 | filing a petition alleging that the development order is not |
| 1115 | consistent with the provisions of this part notice of appeal |
| 1116 | with the commission. The appropriate regional planning agency by |
| 1117 | vote at a regularly scheduled meeting may recommend that the |
| 1118 | state land planning agency undertake an appeal of a development- |
| 1119 | of-regional-impact development order. Upon the request of an |
| 1120 | appropriate regional planning council, affected local |
| 1121 | government, or any citizen, the state land planning agency shall |
| 1122 | consider whether to appeal the order and shall respond to the |
| 1123 | request within the 45-day appeal period. Any appeal taken by a |
| 1124 | regional planning agency between March 1, 1993, and the |
| 1125 | effective date of this section may only be continued if the |
| 1126 | state land planning agency has also filed an appeal. Any appeal |
| 1127 | initiated by a regional planning agency on or before March 1, |
| 1128 | 1993, shall continue until completion of the appeal process and |
| 1129 | any subsequent appellate review, as if the regional planning |
| 1130 | agency were authorized to initiate the appeal. |
| 1131 | (3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an appeal |
| 1132 | of a development order by the state land planning agency under |
| 1133 | this section may include consistency of the development order |
| 1134 | with the local comprehensive plan. However, if a development |
| 1135 | order relating to a development of regional impact has been |
| 1136 | challenged in a proceeding under s. 163.3215 and a party to the |
| 1137 | proceeding serves notice to the state land planning agency of |
| 1138 | the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215, the state land |
| 1139 | planning agency shall: |
| 1140 | (a) Raise its consistency issues by intervening as a full |
| 1141 | party in the pending proceeding under s. 163.3215 within 30 days |
| 1142 | after service of the notice; and |
| 1143 | (b) Dismiss the consistency issues from the development |
| 1144 | order appeal. |
| 1145 | (4) The appellant shall furnish a copy of the petition to |
| 1146 | the opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local |
| 1147 | government that issued the order. The filing of the petition |
| 1148 | stays the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
| 1149 | of the appeal process. |
| 1150 | (5)(3) The 45-day appeal period for a development of |
| 1151 | regional impact within the jurisdiction of more than one local |
| 1152 | government shall not commence until after all the local |
| 1153 | governments having jurisdiction over the proposed development of |
| 1154 | regional impact have rendered their development orders. The |
| 1155 | appellant shall furnish a copy of the notice of appeal to the |
| 1156 | opposing party, as the case may be, and to the local government |
| 1157 | which issued the order. The filing of the notice of appeal shall |
| 1158 | stay the effectiveness of the order until after the completion |
| 1159 | of the appeal process. |
| 1160 | (6)(4) Prior to issuing an order, the Florida Land and |
| 1161 | Water Adjudicatory Commission shall hold a hearing pursuant to |
| 1162 | the provisions of chapter 120. The commission shall encourage |
| 1163 | the submission of appeals on the record made below in cases in |
| 1164 | which the development order was issued after a full and complete |
| 1165 | hearing before the local government or an agency thereof. |
| 1166 | (7)(5) The Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission |
| 1167 | shall issue a decision granting or denying permission to develop |
| 1168 | pursuant to the standards of this chapter and may attach |
| 1169 | conditions and restrictions to its decisions. |
| 1170 | (6) If an appeal is filed with respect to any issues |
| 1171 | within the scope of a permitting program authorized by chapter |
| 1172 | 161, chapter 373, or chapter 403 and for which a permit or |
| 1173 | conceptual review approval has been obtained prior to the |
| 1174 | issuance of a development order, any such issue shall be |
| 1175 | specifically identified in the notice of appeal which is filed |
| 1176 | pursuant to this section, together with other issues which |
| 1177 | constitute grounds for the appeal. The appeal may proceed with |
| 1178 | respect to issues within the scope of permitting programs for |
| 1179 | which a permit or conceptual review approval has been obtained |
| 1180 | prior to the issuance of a development order only after the |
| 1181 | commission determines by majority vote at a regularly scheduled |
| 1182 | commission meeting that statewide or regional interests may be |
| 1183 | adversely affected by the development. In making this |
| 1184 | determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that |
| 1185 | statewide and regional interests relating to issues within the |
| 1186 | scope of the permitting programs for which a permit or |
| 1187 | conceptual approval has been obtained are not adversely |
| 1188 | affected. |
| 1189 | Section 9. Section 380.115, Florida Statutes, is amended |
| 1190 | to read: |
| 1191 | 380.115 Vested rights and duties; effect of size |
| 1192 | reduction, changes in guidelines and standards chs. 2002-20 and |
| 1193 | 2002-296.-- |
| 1194 | (1) A change in a development-of-regional-impact guideline |
| 1195 | and standard does not abridge Nothing contained in this act |
| 1196 | abridges or modify modifies any vested or other right or any |
| 1197 | duty or obligation pursuant to any development order or |
| 1198 | agreement that is applicable to a development of regional impact |
| 1199 | on the effective date of this act. A development that has |
| 1200 | received a development-of-regional-impact development order |
| 1201 | pursuant to s. 380.06, but is no longer required to undergo |
| 1202 | development-of-regional-impact review by operation of a change |
| 1203 | in the guidelines and standards or has reduced its size below |
| 1204 | the thresholds in s. 380.0651 of this act, shall be governed by |
| 1205 | the following procedures: |
| 1206 | (a) The development shall continue to be governed by the |
| 1207 | development-of-regional-impact development order and may be |
| 1208 | completed in reliance upon and pursuant to the development order |
| 1209 | unless the developer or landowner has followed the procedures |
| 1210 | for rescission in paragraph (b). Any proposed changes to those |
| 1211 | developments which continue to be governed by a development |
| 1212 | order shall be approved pursuant to s. 380.06(19) as it existed |
| 1213 | prior to a change in the development-of-regional-impact |
| 1214 | guidelines and standards except that all percentage criteria |
| 1215 | shall be doubled and all other criteria shall be increased by 10 |
| 1216 | percent. The development-of-regional-impact development order |
| 1217 | may be enforced by the local government as provided by ss. |
| 1218 | 380.06(17) and 380.11. |
| 1219 | (b) If requested by the developer or landowner, the |
| 1220 | development-of-regional-impact development order shall may be |
| 1221 | rescinded by the local government having jurisdiction upon a |
| 1222 | showing that all required mitigation related to the amount of |
| 1223 | development that existed on the date of rescission has been |
| 1224 | completed abandoned pursuant to the process in s. 380.06(26). |
| 1225 | (2) A development with an application for development |
| 1226 | approval pending, and determined sufficient pursuant to s. |
| 1227 | 380.06 s. 380.06(10), on the effective date of a change to the |
| 1228 | guidelines and standards this act, or a notification of proposed |
| 1229 | change pending on the effective date of a change to the |
| 1230 | guidelines and standards this act, may elect to continue such |
| 1231 | review pursuant to s. 380.06. At the conclusion of the pending |
| 1232 | review, including any appeals pursuant to s. 380.07, the |
| 1233 | resulting development order shall be governed by the provisions |
| 1234 | of subsection (1). |
| 1235 | (3) A landowner that has filed an application for a |
| 1236 | development-of-regional-impact review prior to the adoption of |
| 1237 | an optional sector plan pursuant to s. 163.3245 may elect to |
| 1238 | have the application reviewed pursuant to s. 380.06, |
| 1239 | comprehensive plan provisions in force prior to adoption of the |
| 1240 | sector plan, and any requested comprehensive plan amendments |
| 1241 | that accompany the application. |
| 1242 | Section 10. Paragraph (i) of subsection (2) of section |
| 1243 | 403.813, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 1244 | 403.813 Permits issued at district centers; exceptions.-- |
| 1245 | (2) A permit is not required under this chapter, chapter |
| 1246 | 373, chapter 61-691, Laws of Florida, or chapter 25214 or |
| 1247 | chapter 25270, 1949, Laws of Florida, for activities associated |
| 1248 | with the following types of projects; however, except as |
| 1249 | otherwise provided in this subsection, nothing in this |
| 1250 | subsection relieves an applicant from any requirement to obtain |
| 1251 | permission to use or occupy lands owned by the Board of Trustees |
| 1252 | of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund or any water management |
| 1253 | district in its governmental or proprietary capacity or from |
| 1254 | complying with applicable local pollution control programs |
| 1255 | authorized under this chapter or other requirements of county |
| 1256 | and municipal governments: |
| 1257 | (i) The construction of private docks of 1,000 square feet |
| 1258 | or less of over-water surface area and seawalls in artificially |
| 1259 | created waterways where such construction will not violate |
| 1260 | existing water quality standards, impede navigation, or affect |
| 1261 | flood control. This exemption does not apply to the construction |
| 1262 | of vertical seawalls in estuaries or lagoons unless the proposed |
| 1263 | construction is within an existing manmade canal where the |
| 1264 | shoreline is currently occupied in whole or part by vertical |
| 1265 | seawalls. |
| 1266 | Section 11. This act shall take effect July 1, 2006. |