| 1 | Representative(s) Galvano offered the following: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 | Amendment (with title amendment) |
| 4 | Between lines 392 and 393, insert: |
| 5 | Section 6. Paragraph (c) is added to subsection (1) of |
| 6 | section 393.0661, Florida Statutes, to read: |
| 7 | 393.0661 Home and community-based services delivery |
| 8 | system; comprehensive redesign.--The Legislature finds that the |
| 9 | home and community-based services delivery system for persons |
| 10 | with developmental disabilities and the availability of |
| 11 | appropriated funds are two of the critical elements in making |
| 12 | services available. Therefore, it is the intent of the |
| 13 | Legislature that the Agency for Persons with Disabilities shall |
| 14 | develop and implement a comprehensive redesign of the system. |
| 15 | (1) The redesign of the home and community-based services |
| 16 | system shall include, at a minimum, all actions necessary to |
| 17 | achieve an appropriate rate structure, client choice within a |
| 18 | specified service package, appropriate assessment strategies, an |
| 19 | efficient billing process that contains reconciliation and |
| 20 | monitoring components, a redefined role for support coordinators |
| 21 | that avoids potential conflicts of interest, and ensures that |
| 22 | family/client budgets are linked to levels of need. |
| 23 | (c) By December 1, 2007, the Agency for Persons with |
| 24 | Disabilities, in consultation with the Agency for Health Care |
| 25 | Administration, shall create a model service delivery system |
| 26 | pilot project for persons with developmental disabilities who |
| 27 | receive services under the developmental disabilities waiver |
| 28 | program administered by the Agency for Persons with |
| 29 | Disabilities. Persons with developmental disabilities who |
| 30 | receive services under the family and supported living waiver |
| 31 | program or the consumer-directed care plus waiver program |
| 32 | administered by the Agency for Persons with Disabilities may |
| 33 | also be included in the system if the agency determines that |
| 34 | such inclusion is feasible and will improve coordination of care |
| 35 | and management of costs. The system must transfer and combine |
| 36 | all services funded by Medicaid waiver programs and services |
| 37 | funded only by the state, including room and board and supported |
| 38 | living payments, for individuals who participate in the system. |
| 39 | The pilot project shall document increased client outcomes that |
| 40 | are known to be associated with a valid needs assessment of the |
| 41 | level of need of the client, rate setting based on the level of |
| 42 | need, and encouragement of the use of community-centered |
| 43 | services and supports. The pilot project shall implement strong |
| 44 | utilization control, such as capped rates, in order to ensure |
| 45 | predictable and controlled annual costs. Medicaid service |
| 46 | delivery, including, but not limited to, service authorization, |
| 47 | care management, and monitoring shall be managed locally through |
| 48 | the area office of the Agency for Persons with Disabilities in |
| 49 | order to encourage provider development. Support coordination |
| 50 | services shall be available to individuals participating in the |
| 51 | pilot program. |
| 52 | 1. The Legislature intends that the service delivery |
| 53 | system provide recipients in Medicaid waiver programs with a |
| 54 | coordinated system of services, increased cost predictability, |
| 55 | and a stabilized rate of increase in Medicaid expenditures while |
| 56 | ensuring: |
| 57 | a. Consumer choice. |
| 58 | b. Opportunities for consumer-directed services. |
| 59 | c. Access to medically necessary services. |
| 60 | d. Coordination of community-based services. |
| 61 | e. Reductions in the unnecessary use of services. |
| 62 | 2. The Agency for Persons with Disabilities shall |
| 63 | implement the system on a pilot basis in Area 1 and may conduct |
| 64 | a similar pilot in an urban area of the Agency for Persons with |
| 65 | Disabilities, in consultation with the Agency for Health Care |
| 66 | Administration. After completion of the development phase of the |
| 67 | system, attainment of necessary federal approval, selection of |
| 68 | qualified providers, and rate setting, the Agency for Persons |
| 69 | with Disabilities shall delegate administration of the system to |
| 70 | the administrator of the agency's local area office. The Agency |
| 71 | for Persons with Disabilities shall set standards for qualified |
| 72 | providers and provide quality assurance, monitoring oversight, |
| 73 | and other duties necessary for the system. The enrollment of |
| 74 | Medicaid waiver recipients into the system in pilot areas shall |
| 75 | be mandatory. |
| 76 | 3. The local area office shall administer the pilot |
| 77 | program and shall be responsible for ensuring that the costs of |
| 78 | the program do not exceed the amount of funds allocated for the |
| 79 | program. The agency area administrator shall also: |
| 80 | a. Identify the needs of the recipients using a |
| 81 | standardized assessment process approved by the agency. |
| 82 | b. Allow a recipient to select any provider that has been |
| 83 | qualified by the agency, provided that the service offered by |
| 84 | the provider is appropriate to meet the needs of the recipient. |
| 85 | c. Make a good faith effort to select qualified providers |
| 86 | currently providing Medicaid waiver services for the agency in |
| 87 | the pilot area. |
| 88 | d. Develop and use a service provider qualification system |
| 89 | approved by the agency that describes the quality of care |
| 90 | standards that providers of service to persons with |
| 91 | developmental disabilities must meet in order to provide |
| 92 | services within the pilot area. |
| 93 | e. Exclude, when feasible, chronically poor-performing |
| 94 | providers and facilities as determined by the agency. |
| 95 | f. Demonstrate a quality assurance system and a |
| 96 | performance improvement system that are satisfactory to the |
| 97 | agency. |
| 98 | 4. The agency must ensure that the rate-setting |
| 99 | methodology for the system reflects the intent to provide |
| 100 | quality care in the least restrictive setting appropriate for |
| 101 | the recipient and provide for choice by the recipient. The |
| 102 | agency may choose to limit financial risk for the pilot area |
| 103 | operating the system to cover high-cost recipients or to address |
| 104 | the catastrophic care needs of recipients enrolled in the |
| 105 | system. |
| 106 | 5. Within 24 months after implementation, the agency shall |
| 107 | contract for a comprehensive evaluation of the system. The |
| 108 | evaluation must include assessments of cost savings, cost- |
| 109 | effectiveness, recipient outcomes, consumer choice, access to |
| 110 | services, coordination of care, and quality of care. The |
| 111 | evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, an assessment |
| 112 | of the following aspects: |
| 113 | a. A study of the funding patterns of the cost-prediction |
| 114 | methodology before and after implementation of the pilot |
| 115 | program; |
| 116 | b. A study of the service utilization patterns of the |
| 117 | cost-prediction methodology before and after implementation of |
| 118 | the pilot program; |
| 119 | c. The accuracy of the cost-prediction methodology in |
| 120 | explaining and predicting funding levels for individuals |
| 121 | receiving each of the three waivers in the pilot areas; |
| 122 | d. The accuracy of the cost-prediction methodology and a |
| 123 | plan for dealing with cases involving individuals with the |
| 124 | highest and lowest support needs and funding levels; |
| 125 | e. A survey of consumer satisfaction regarding consumer |
| 126 | choice, scope of services, and proposed funding levels generated |
| 127 | by the cost-prediction methodology in the pilot areas; |
| 128 | f. The applicability of the cost-prediction methodology |
| 129 | to explain and predict funding levels for all individuals |
| 130 | receiving the waivers; |
| 131 | g. The robustness of the cost-prediction methodology to |
| 132 | withstand appeals and grievances; and |
| 133 | h. A systematic comparison of the outcomes in both pilot |
| 134 | areas and the different models that are demonstrated. |
| 135 | 6. Each pilot area shall form an advisory committee that |
| 136 | includes representatives from the stakeholder community, |
| 137 | including persons with disabilities, family members of persons |
| 138 | with disabilities, members of disability advocacy groups, and |
| 139 | representatives of program service providers to provide feedback |
| 140 | and monitor the implementation of the pilot program on at least |
| 141 | a quarterly basis. |
| 142 | 7. The Agency for Persons with Disabilities shall form an |
| 143 | advisory committee that includes representatives from the |
| 144 | stakeholder community, including persons with disabilities, |
| 145 | family members of persons with disabilities, members of |
| 146 | disability advocacy groups, and representatives of program |
| 147 | service providers to provide feedback and monitor the |
| 148 | implementation of the pilot program from a statewide |
| 149 | perspective. |
| 150 | 8. The advisory committees shall submit reports evaluating |
| 151 | the progress of the pilot programs to the President of the |
| 152 | Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives on a |
| 153 | quarterly basis. |
| 154 | 9. The agency shall submit a report that describes the |
| 155 | administrative or legal barriers to the implementation and |
| 156 | operation of the system, including recommendations regarding |
| 157 | statewide expansion of the system and a recommendation for the |
| 158 | model service delivery system to be implemented statewide, to |
| 159 | the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of |
| 160 | the House of Representatives no later than December 31, 2008. |
| 161 | 10. The agency, in coordination with the Agency for Health |
| 162 | Care Administration, may seek federal waivers or Medicaid state |
| 163 | plan amendments and adopt rules as necessary to administer the |
| 164 | system on a pilot basis. The agency must receive specific |
| 165 | authorization from the Legislature prior to expanding beyond the |
| 166 | pilot areas designated for the implementation of this system. |
| 167 | Further expansion of this pilot project requires approval by the |
| 168 | Legislature. |
| 169 |
|
| 170 | ======= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ======= |
| 171 | Remove line(s) 16 and insert: |
| 172 | anesthesiologist assistant; amending s. 393.0661, F.S.; |
| 173 | requiring the Agency for Persons with Disabilities, in |
| 174 | consultation with the Agency for Health Care Administration, to |
| 175 | implement federal waivers to create a model service delivery |
| 176 | system pilot project for Medicaid recipients with developmental |
| 177 | disabilities; providing legislative intent; providing for |
| 178 | implementation of the system on a pilot basis in certain areas |
| 179 | of the state; providing for administration of the system by the |
| 180 | Agency for Persons with Disabilities; providing requirements for |
| 181 | selection of service providers to operate the system; providing |
| 182 | for mandatory enrollment in pilot areas; requiring an evaluation |
| 183 | of the system; providing for the formation of local and |
| 184 | statewide advisory committees; requiring the committees to |
| 185 | submit quarterly reports to the Legislature; requiring the |
| 186 | agency to submit a report to the Governor and Legislature; |
| 187 | authorizing the agency to seek federal waivers or Medicaid state |
| 188 | plan amendments and adopt rules; requiring the agency to receive |
| 189 | specific authorization from the Legislature before expanding the |
| 190 | system; providing an effective date. |