| 1 | Representative(s) Sachs offered the following: | 
| 2 | 
 | 
| 3 | Amendment (with title amendment) | 
| 4 | Remove everything after the enacting clause and insert: | 
| 5 | Section 1.  Subsections (6) through (20) of section 61.046, | 
| 6 | Florida Statutes, are renumbered as subsections (7) through | 
| 7 | (21), respectively, and a new subsection (6) is added to that | 
| 8 | section to read: | 
| 9 | 61.046  Definitions.--As used in this chapter: | 
| 10 | (6)  "Electronic communication" means contact, other than | 
| 11 | face-to-face contact, facilitated by tools such as telephones, | 
| 12 | electronic mail (e-mail), web cams, video-conferencing equipment | 
| 13 | and software or other wired or wireless technologies, or other | 
| 14 | means of communication to supplement face-to-face contact | 
| 15 | between a parent and that parent's minor child. | 
| 16 | Section 2.  Section 61.13002, Florida Statutes, is created | 
| 17 | to read: | 
| 18 | 61.13002  Court-ordered electronic communication between a | 
| 19 | parent and a child.-- | 
| 20 | (1)(a)  In connection with proceedings under this chapter, | 
| 21 | a court may order electronic communication between a parent and | 
| 22 | a child. Before ordering electronic communication, a court must | 
| 23 | consider: | 
| 24 | 1.  Whether electronic communication is in a child's best | 
| 25 | interests; | 
| 26 | 2.  Whether communication equipment and technology to | 
| 27 | provide electronic communication is reasonably available, | 
| 28 | accessible, and affordable; | 
| 29 | 3.  Each parent's history of substance abuse or domestic | 
| 30 | violence; and | 
| 31 | 4.  Any other factor that the court considers material. | 
| 32 | (b)  Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a rebuttable | 
| 33 | presumption is created providing that it is in the best | 
| 34 | interests of a child for a parent and child to have reasonable | 
| 35 | telephone communication. Unless this presumption is rebutted, | 
| 36 | the court shall order telephone communication. | 
| 37 | (c)  The court may set safeguards or guidelines for | 
| 38 | electronic communication. | 
| 39 | (2)  If the court finds that one or both parents will incur | 
| 40 | additional costs in order to implement electronic communication | 
| 41 | with the child, the court shall allocate such expenses arising | 
| 42 | solely from the electronic communication between the parents | 
| 43 | after considering the respective parent's financial | 
| 44 | circumstances. | 
| 45 | (3)  If the court enters an order granting electronic | 
| 46 | communication, each parent shall furnish the other parent with | 
| 47 | the access information necessary to facilitate electronic | 
| 48 | communication. Each parent shall notify the other parent of any | 
| 49 | change in the access information within 7 days after the change. | 
| 50 | (4)  Electronic communication may be used only to | 
| 51 | supplement a parent's face-to-face contact with his or her minor | 
| 52 | child. Electronic communication may not be used to replace or as | 
| 53 | a substitute for face-to-face contact. | 
| 54 | (5)  A party to a child custody order that does not | 
| 55 | prohibit electronic communication may move a court to order | 
| 56 | electronic communication. Such a party need not prove a | 
| 57 | substantial change in circumstances. | 
| 58 | (6)  The court may not consider the availability of | 
| 59 | electronic communication as the sole determinative factor when | 
| 60 | considering relocation. | 
| 61 | (7)  The extent or amount of time that electronic | 
| 62 | communication with the child is ordered under s. 61.13 may not | 
| 63 | be used as a factor when the court calculates child support. | 
| 64 | (8)  This section does not apply to any judgment or order | 
| 65 | issued before October 1, 2007. | 
| 66 | Section 3.  This act shall take effect October 1, 2007. | 
| 67 | 
 | 
| 68 | ======= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ========== | 
| 69 | Remove the entire title and insert: | 
| 70 | A bill to be entitled | 
| 71 | An act relating to the use of technology to supplement | 
| 72 | visitation; amending s. 61.046, F.S.; defining the term | 
| 73 | "electronic communication"; creating s. 61.13002, F.S.; | 
| 74 | authorizing a court to order electronic communication between a | 
| 75 | parent and a child; specifying factors a court must consider | 
| 76 | before ordering electronic communication; creating a rebuttable | 
| 77 | presumption in favor of telephone communication; requiring each | 
| 78 | parent to furnish the other parent with information necessary to | 
| 79 | facilitate electronic communication; declaring that electronic | 
| 80 | communication may be used only to supplement, not supplant, a | 
| 81 | parent's face-to-face contact with his or her child; authorizing | 
| 82 | a person to seek court-ordered electronic communication without | 
| 83 | proving a substantial change in circumstances; prohibiting the | 
| 84 | consideration of electronic communication as a factor in | 
| 85 | determining child support; providing applicability; providing an | 
| 86 | effective date. |