| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act relating to beach management; amending s. 161.142, |
| 3 | F.S.; providing legislative intent and findings; providing |
| 4 | requirements concerning the quality and quantity of |
| 5 | dredged sand placed on certain beaches adjacent to inlets; |
| 6 | requiring an estimation of the requisite quantity of |
| 7 | beach-quality sand by the Department of Environmental |
| 8 | Protection and its consultants; removing exemptions from |
| 9 | permitting requirements and prohibitions for certain |
| 10 | construction activities; requiring the protection of |
| 11 | shorebirds and marine turtles; applying requirements |
| 12 | concerning the placement of dredged sand on adjacent |
| 13 | beaches to the inlet management projects of certain ports; |
| 14 | providing an exemption from such requirements; providing |
| 15 | that the inlet projects of such ports are eligible for |
| 16 | funding; providing requirements and findings concerning |
| 17 | the placement of dredged sand from federal navigation |
| 18 | projects; providing for assignment of responsibility for |
| 19 | the erosion caused by inlets; specifying actions to be |
| 20 | taken by the department in disputes between local |
| 21 | governments and property owners concerning how much sand |
| 22 | should bypass an inlet; creating s. 161.143, F.S.; |
| 23 | requiring that inlet management studies, projects, and |
| 24 | activities be supported by certain plans; providing |
| 25 | criteria governing the department's ranking of inlet |
| 26 | management projects and activities; specifying conditions |
| 27 | that must be met; requiring that the department establish |
| 28 | funding priorities for projects and activities concerning |
| 29 | inlet management; providing for input from interested |
| 30 | governmental and private entities; providing criteria for |
| 31 | establishing priorities; authorizing funding levels for |
| 32 | inlet management projects under specified conditions; |
| 33 | requiring that the department annually provide an inlet |
| 34 | management project list to the Legislature; providing |
| 35 | requirements for the list; requiring that the department |
| 36 | make available certain moneys for projects on the list; |
| 37 | requiring that the department make available certain |
| 38 | moneys for projects on the list which are legislatively |
| 39 | approved; requiring that the Legislature designate a |
| 40 | certain inlet project as "Inlet of the Year"; requiring |
| 41 | the department to provide an annual report to the |
| 42 | Legislature concerning the success of projects so |
| 43 | designated; requiring rulemaking by the department; |
| 44 | providing an effective date. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 47 |
|
| 48 | Section 1. Section 161.142, Florida Statutes, is amended |
| 49 | to read: |
| 50 | 161.142 Declaration of public policy relating to improved |
| 51 | navigation inlets.--The Legislature hereby recognizes the need |
| 52 | for maintaining navigation inlets to promote commercial and |
| 53 | recreational uses of our coastal waters and their resources. The |
| 54 | Legislature further recognizes that inlets interrupt or alter |
| 55 | the natural drift of beach-quality sand resources, which often |
| 56 | results in these sand resources being deposited in nearshore |
| 57 | around shallow outer-bar areas or in the inlet channel instead |
| 58 | of providing natural nourishment to the adjacent eroding |
| 59 | downdrift beaches. Accordingly, the Legislature finds it is in |
| 60 | the public interest to replicate the natural drift of sand which |
| 61 | is interrupted or altered by inlets to be replaced and for each |
| 62 | level of government to undertake all reasonable efforts to |
| 63 | maximize inlet sand bypassing to ensure that beach-quality sand |
| 64 | is placed on adjacent eroding beaches. Such activities cannot |
| 65 | make up for the historical sand deficits caused by inlets but |
| 66 | shall be designed to reinstate longshore sand transport and |
| 67 | extend the life of proximate beach-restoration projects so that |
| 68 | periodic nourishment is needed less frequently. Therefore, in |
| 69 | furtherance of this declaration of public policy and the |
| 70 | Legislature's intent to redirect and recommit the state's |
| 71 | comprehensive beach management efforts to address the beach |
| 72 | erosion caused by inlets, the department shall ensure that: |
| 73 | (1) All construction and maintenance dredgings of beach- |
| 74 | quality sand are should be placed on the adjacent eroding |
| 75 | downdrift beaches unless; or, if placed elsewhere, an equivalent |
| 76 | quality and quantity of sand from an alternate location is |
| 77 | should be placed on the adjacent eroding downdrift beaches. |
| 78 | (2) On an average annual basis, a quantity of beach- |
| 79 | quality sand is should be placed on the adjacent eroding |
| 80 | downdrift beaches which is equal to the natural net annual |
| 81 | longshore sediment transport. The department shall, with the |
| 82 | assistance of university-based or other contractual resources |
| 83 | that it may employ or call upon, maintain a current estimate of |
| 84 | such quantities of sand for purposes of prioritizing, planning, |
| 85 | and permitting. |
| 86 | (3) Construction waterward of the coastal construction |
| 87 | control line on downdrift coastal areas, on islands |
| 88 | substantially created by the deposit of spoil, located within 1 |
| 89 | mile of the centerline of navigation channels or inlets, |
| 90 | providing access to ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b), which |
| 91 | suffers or has suffered erosion caused by such navigation |
| 92 | channel maintenance or construction shall be exempt from the |
| 93 | permitting requirements and prohibitions of subsections (2), |
| 94 | (5), and (6) of s. 161.053. The timing and sequence of any |
| 95 | construction activities associated with inlet management |
| 96 | projects in such coastal areas shall comply with 44 C.F.R. part |
| 97 | 60 and shall provide protection to nesting sea turtles and their |
| 98 | hatchlings and their habitats, to nesting shorebirds, and to |
| 99 | native salt-resistant vegetation and endangered plant |
| 100 | communities. Beach-quality sand placed on the beach as part of |
| 101 | an inlet management project must be suitable for marine turtle |
| 102 | nesting. |
| 103 | (4) The provisions of subsections (1) and (2) shall not be |
| 104 | a requirement imposed upon ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b) are |
| 105 | subject to this section and may sponsor or cosponsor inlet |
| 106 | management projects that are fully eligible for state cost- |
| 107 | sharing. Such ports must demonstrate reasonable effort to place |
| 108 | beach-quality sand from construction and maintenance dredging |
| 109 | and port-development projects on adjacent eroding beaches; |
| 110 | however, if the department finds that the public interest would |
| 111 | be served, the department may permit such ports to place less |
| 112 | than the annualized equivalent volume of sand on adjacent |
| 113 | eroding beaches as otherwise required under subsection (2). |
| 114 | (5) The department shall ensure that any disposal of the |
| 115 | beach-quality sand from federal projects in this state which |
| 116 | involve dredging for the purpose of navigation is on, or in the |
| 117 | nearshore area of, adjacent eroding beaches. The department may |
| 118 | consider permitting offshore or upland disposal of such beach- |
| 119 | quality sand if emergency conditions exist. The state recognizes |
| 120 | that due to the growing demand for beach-quality sand resources |
| 121 | for beach restoration and nourishment projects, the limited |
| 122 | supply of such sand resources, and the cost of such projects, |
| 123 | beach or nearshore sand placement is the least-cost disposal |
| 124 | method. |
| 125 | (6) If federal investigations and reports or state- |
| 126 | approved inlet management plans do not specify the entity or |
| 127 | entities responsible for the extent of erosion caused by an |
| 128 | inlet, the department or local government, with the assistance |
| 129 | of university-based or other contractual resources that they may |
| 130 | employ or call upon, is encouraged to undertake assessments that |
| 131 | aid in specifying the responsible entity or entities and in more |
| 132 | accurately determining cost-sharing responsibilities for |
| 133 | measures to correct such erosion. The entity that is responsible |
| 134 | for maintenance dredging of an inlet may be deemed responsible |
| 135 | for the erosion caused by the inlet if another responsible party |
| 136 | is not specified in such an assessment, a shore-protection |
| 137 | project investigation or report, or a state-approved inlet |
| 138 | management plan. |
| 139 | (7) If the beneficiaries of the inlet, the local |
| 140 | governments having jurisdiction of lands adjacent to the inlet, |
| 141 | or the owners of property adjacent to the inlet are involved in |
| 142 | a dispute concerning how much sand should be bypassed, the |
| 143 | department shall protect its monetary investment in beach |
| 144 | nourishment projects within the inlet's physical zone of |
| 145 | influence by taking all reasonable actions to reinstate the |
| 146 | natural longshore transport of sand, including implementation of |
| 147 | inlet sand bypassing and other inlet management projects. |
| 148 | Section 2. Section 161.143, Florida Statutes, is created |
| 149 | to read: |
| 150 | 161.143 Inlet management; planning, prioritizing, funding, |
| 151 | approving, and implementing projects.-- |
| 152 | (1) Studies, projects, and activities for the purpose of |
| 153 | mitigating the erosive effects of inlets and reinstating the |
| 154 | natural longshore flow of sand to adjacent eroding beaches must |
| 155 | be supported by separately approved inlet management plans or |
| 156 | inlet components of the statewide comprehensive beach management |
| 157 | plan. Such plans in support of individual inlet projects or |
| 158 | activities must, pursuant to s. 161.161(1)(b), evaluate each |
| 159 | inlet to determine the extent of the inlet's erosive effect on |
| 160 | adjacent beaches and, if significant, make recommendations to |
| 161 | mitigate such ongoing erosive effects and provide estimated |
| 162 | costs for such mitigation. |
| 163 | (2) The department shall establish annual funding |
| 164 | priorities for studies, activities, or other projects concerning |
| 165 | inlet management. Such inlet management projects include, but |
| 166 | are not limited to, inlet sand bypassing, modifications to |
| 167 | channel dredging, jetty redesign, jetty repair, disposal of |
| 168 | spoil material, and the development, revision, adoption, or |
| 169 | implementation of an inlet management plan. The funding |
| 170 | priorities established by the department must be consistent with |
| 171 | the requirements and legislative declaration in ss. 161.101(14), |
| 172 | 161.142, and 161.161(1)(b). In establishing funding priorities |
| 173 | under this subsection and before transmitting the annual inlet |
| 174 | project list to the Legislature under subsection (5), the |
| 175 | department shall seek formal input from local coastal |
| 176 | governments, beach and general government associations and other |
| 177 | coastal interest groups, and university experts concerning |
| 178 | annual funding priorities for inlet management projects. In |
| 179 | order to maximize the benefits of efforts to address the inlet- |
| 180 | caused beach erosion problems of this state, the ranking |
| 181 | criteria used by the department to establish funding priorities |
| 182 | for studies, activities, or other projects concerning inlet |
| 183 | management must include consideration of: |
| 184 | (a) An estimate of the annual quantity of beach-quality |
| 185 | sand reaching the updrift boundary of the improved jetty or |
| 186 | inlet channel. |
| 187 | (b) The severity of the erosion to the adjacent beaches |
| 188 | caused by the inlet and the extent to which the proposed project |
| 189 | mitigates the erosive effects of the inlet. |
| 190 | (c) The overall significance and anticipated success of |
| 191 | the proposed project in reinstating the natural longshore |
| 192 | transport of sand and addressing the sand deficit along the |
| 193 | inlet-affected shorelines. |
| 194 | (d) The extent to which existing bypassing activities at |
| 195 | an inlet would benefit from modest, cost-effective improvements |
| 196 | when considering the volumetric increases from the proposed |
| 197 | project, the availability of beach-quality sand currently not |
| 198 | being bypassed to adjacent eroding beaches, and the ease with |
| 199 | which such beach-quality sand may be obtained. |
| 200 | (e) The interest and commitment of local governments as |
| 201 | demonstrated by their willingness to coordinate the planning, |
| 202 | design, construction, and maintenance of an inlet management |
| 203 | project and their financial plan for funding the local cost- |
| 204 | share for initial construction, ongoing sand bypassing, channel |
| 205 | dredging, and maintenance. |
| 206 | (f) The previous completion or approval of a state- |
| 207 | sponsored inlet management plan or local-government-sponsored |
| 208 | inlet study concerning the inlet addressed by the proposed |
| 209 | project, the ease of updating and revising any such plan or |
| 210 | study, and the adequacy and specificity of the plan's or study's |
| 211 | recommendations concerning the mitigation of an inlet's erosive |
| 212 | effects on adjacent beaches. |
| 213 | (g) The degree to which the proposed project will enhance |
| 214 | the performance and longevity of proximate beach nourishment |
| 215 | projects, thereby reducing the frequency of such periodic |
| 216 | nourishment projects. |
| 217 | (h) The project-ranking criteria in s. 161.101(14) to the |
| 218 | extent such criteria are applicable to inlet management studies, |
| 219 | projects, and activities. |
| 220 | (3) The department may, pursuant to s. 161.101 and |
| 221 | notwithstanding s. 161.101(15), pay from legislative |
| 222 | appropriations provided for these purposes 75 percent of the |
| 223 | total costs, or, if applicable, the nonfederal costs, of a |
| 224 | study, activity, or other project concerning the management of |
| 225 | an inlet. The balance must be paid by the local governments or |
| 226 | special districts having jurisdiction over the property where |
| 227 | the inlet is located. |
| 228 | (4) Using the legislative appropriation to the statewide |
| 229 | beach-management-support category of the department's fixed |
| 230 | capital outlay funding request, the department may employ |
| 231 | university-based or other contractual sources and pay 100 |
| 232 | percent of the costs of studies that are consistent with the |
| 233 | legislative declaration in s. 161.142 and that: |
| 234 | (a) Determine, calculate, refine, and achieve general |
| 235 | consensus regarding net annual sediment transport volumes to be |
| 236 | used for the purpose of planning and prioritizing inlet |
| 237 | management projects; and |
| 238 | (b) Appropriate, assign, and apportion responsibilities |
| 239 | between inlet beneficiaries for the erosion caused by a |
| 240 | particular inlet on adjacent beaches. |
| 241 | (5) The department shall annually provide an inlet |
| 242 | management project list, in priority order, to the Legislature |
| 243 | as part of the department's budget request. The list must |
| 244 | include studies, projects, or other activities that address the |
| 245 | management of at least 10 separate inlets and that are ranked |
| 246 | according to the criteria established under subsection (2). |
| 247 | (a) The department shall make available at least 10 |
| 248 | percent of the total amount that the Legislature appropriates in |
| 249 | each fiscal year for statewide beach management for the three |
| 250 | highest-ranked projects on the current year's inlet management |
| 251 | project list. |
| 252 | (b) The department shall make available at least 50 |
| 253 | percent of the funds appropriated for the feasibility and design |
| 254 | category in the department's fixed capital outlay funding |
| 255 | request for projects on the current year's inlet management |
| 256 | project list which involve the study for, or design or |
| 257 | development of, an inlet management project. |
| 258 | (c) The department shall make available all statewide |
| 259 | beach management funds that remain unencumbered or are allocated |
| 260 | to non-project-specific activities for projects on legislatively |
| 261 | approved inlet management project lists. Funding for local- |
| 262 | government-specific projects on annual project lists approved by |
| 263 | the Legislature must remain available for such purposes for a |
| 264 | period of 18 months pursuant to s. 216.301(2)(a). Based on an |
| 265 | assessment and the department's determination that a project |
| 266 | will not be ready to proceed during this 18-month period, such |
| 267 | funds shall be used for inlet management projects on |
| 268 | legislatively approved lists. |
| 269 | (d) The Legislature shall designate one of the three |
| 270 | highest projects on the inlet management project list in any |
| 271 | year as the Inlet of the Year. The department shall annually |
| 272 | report to the Legislature concerning the extent to which each |
| 273 | inlet project designated by the Legislature as Inlet of the Year |
| 274 | has succeeded in reinstating the natural longshore transport of |
| 275 | sand around inlets, mitigating the inlet's erosive effects on |
| 276 | adjacent beaches, and transferring or otherwise placing beach- |
| 277 | quality sand on adjacent eroding beaches. |
| 278 | (6) The department shall adopt rules under ss. 120.536(1) |
| 279 | and 120.54 to administer this section. |
| 280 | Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2008. |