| 1 | A bill to be entitled | 
| 2 | An act relating to beach management; amending s. 161.142, | 
| 3 | F.S.; providing legislative intent and findings; providing | 
| 4 | requirements concerning the quality and quantity of | 
| 5 | dredged sand placed on certain beaches adjacent to inlets; | 
| 6 | requiring an estimation of the requisite quantity of | 
| 7 | beach-quality sand by the Department of Environmental | 
| 8 | Protection and its consultants; revising exemptions from | 
| 9 | certain permitting requirements and prohibitions for | 
| 10 | certain construction activities; requiring compliance with | 
| 11 | the applicable Florida Building Code; requiring the | 
| 12 | protection of nesting shorebirds and marine turtles; | 
| 13 | specifying requirements of certain ports concerning the | 
| 14 | placement of dredged sand on adjacent eroding beaches; | 
| 15 | authorizing such ports to sponsor or cosponsor inlet | 
| 16 | management projects that are fully eligible for state | 
| 17 | cost-sharing; providing requirements and findings | 
| 18 | concerning the placement of dredged sand from federal | 
| 19 | navigation projects; providing for assignment of | 
| 20 | responsibility for the erosion caused by inlets; | 
| 21 | specifying actions to be taken by the department in | 
| 22 | disputes between local governments and property owners | 
| 23 | concerning how much sand should bypass an inlet; creating | 
| 24 | s. 161.143, F.S.; requiring that inlet management studies, | 
| 25 | projects, and activities be supported by certain plans; | 
| 26 | providing criteria governing the department's ranking of | 
| 27 | inlet management projects and activities; specifying | 
| 28 | conditions that must be met; requiring that the department | 
| 29 | establish funding priorities for projects and activities | 
| 30 | concerning inlet management; providing for input from | 
| 31 | interested governmental and private entities; providing | 
| 32 | criteria for establishing priorities; authorizing funding | 
| 33 | levels for inlet management projects under specified | 
| 34 | conditions; requiring that the department annually provide | 
| 35 | an inlet management project list to the Legislature; | 
| 36 | providing requirements for the list; requiring that the | 
| 37 | department make available certain moneys for projects on | 
| 38 | the list; requiring that the department make available | 
| 39 | certain moneys for projects on other legislatively | 
| 40 | approved inlet management project lists; requiring that | 
| 41 | the Legislature designate a certain inlet project as | 
| 42 | "Inlet of the Year"; requiring the department to provide | 
| 43 | an annual report to the Legislature concerning the success | 
| 44 | of projects so designated; requiring rulemaking by the | 
| 45 | department; providing an effective date. | 
| 46 | 
 | 
| 47 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: | 
| 48 | 
 | 
| 49 | Section 1.  Section 161.142, Florida Statutes, is amended | 
| 50 | to read: | 
| 51 | 161.142  Declaration of public policy relating to improved | 
| 52 | navigation inlets.--The Legislature herebyrecognizes the need | 
| 53 | for maintaining navigation inlets to promote commercial and | 
| 54 | recreational uses of our coastal waters and their resources. The | 
| 55 | Legislature further recognizes that inlets interrupt or alter | 
| 56 | the natural drift of beach-quality sand resources, which often | 
| 57 | results in these sand resources being deposited in nearshore | 
| 58 | around shallow outer-barareas or in the inlet channel instead | 
| 59 | of providing natural nourishment to the adjacent eroding | 
| 60 | downdriftbeaches. Accordingly, the Legislature finds it is in | 
| 61 | the public interest to replicate the natural drift of sand which | 
| 62 | is interrupted or altered by inlets to be replaced and for each | 
| 63 | level of government to undertake all reasonable efforts to | 
| 64 | maximize inlet sand bypassing to ensure that beach-quality sand | 
| 65 | is placed on adjacent eroding beaches. Such activities cannot | 
| 66 | make up for the historical sand deficits caused by inlets but | 
| 67 | shall be designed to balance the sediment budget of the inlet | 
| 68 | and adjacent beaches and extend the life of proximate beach- | 
| 69 | restoration projects so that periodic nourishment is needed less | 
| 70 | frequently. Therefore, in furtherance of this declaration of | 
| 71 | public policy and the Legislature's intent to redirect and | 
| 72 | recommit the state's comprehensive beach management efforts to | 
| 73 | address the beach erosion caused by inlets, the department shall | 
| 74 | ensure that: | 
| 75 | (1)  All construction and maintenance dredgings of beach- | 
| 76 | quality sand are should beplaced on the adjacent eroding | 
| 77 | downdriftbeaches unless; or, if placed elsewhere, an equivalent | 
| 78 | quality and quantity of sand from an alternate location is | 
| 79 | should beplaced on the adjacent erodingdowndriftbeaches. | 
| 80 | (2)  On an average annual basis, a quantity of beach- | 
| 81 | quality sand is should beplaced on the adjacent eroding | 
| 82 | downdriftbeaches which is equal to the natural net annual | 
| 83 | longshore sediment transport. The department shall, with the | 
| 84 | assistance of university-based or other contractual resources | 
| 85 | that it may employ or call upon, maintain a current estimate of | 
| 86 | such quantities of sand for purposes of prioritizing, planning, | 
| 87 | and permitting. | 
| 88 | (3)  Construction waterward of the coastal construction | 
| 89 | control line on downdrift coastal areas, on islands | 
| 90 | substantially created by the deposit of spoil, located within 1 | 
| 91 | mile of the centerline of navigation channels or inlets, | 
| 92 | providing access to ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b), which | 
| 93 | suffers or has suffered erosion caused by such navigation | 
| 94 | channel maintenance or construction shall be exempt from the | 
| 95 | permitting requirements and prohibitions of subsections (2),  | 
| 96 | (5), and (6) ofs. 161.053(5) or (6); however, such construction | 
| 97 | shall comply with the applicable Florida Building Code adopted | 
| 98 | pursuant to s. 553.73. The timing and sequence of any | 
| 99 | construction activities associated with inlet management | 
| 100 | projects in such coastal areas shall comply with 44 C.F.R. part  | 
| 101 | 60 andshall provide protection to nesting sea turtles and their | 
| 102 | hatchlings and theirhabitats, to nesting shorebirds, and to | 
| 103 | native salt-resistant vegetation and endangered plant | 
| 104 | communities. Beach-quality sand placed on the beach as part of | 
| 105 | an inlet management project must be suitable for marine turtle | 
| 106 | nesting. | 
| 107 | (4)  The provisions of subsections (1) and (2) shall not be | 
| 108 | a requirement imposed upon ports listed in s. 403.021(9)(b); | 
| 109 | however, such ports must demonstrate reasonable effort to place | 
| 110 | beach-quality sand from construction and maintenance dredging | 
| 111 | and port-development projects on adjacent eroding beaches in | 
| 112 | accordance with port master plans approved by the Department of | 
| 113 | Community Affairs, and permits approved and issued by the | 
| 114 | department, to ensure compliance with this section. Ports may | 
| 115 | sponsor or cosponsor inlet management projects that are fully | 
| 116 | eligible for state cost-sharing. | 
| 117 | (5)  The department shall ensure that any disposal of the | 
| 118 | beach-quality sand from federal projects in this state which | 
| 119 | involve dredging for the purpose of navigation is on, or in the | 
| 120 | nearshore area of, adjacent eroding beaches. The department may | 
| 121 | consider permitting nearshore or upland disposal of such beach- | 
| 122 | quality sand if emergency conditions exist. The state recognizes | 
| 123 | that due to the growing demand for beach-quality sand resources | 
| 124 | for beach restoration and nourishment projects, the limited | 
| 125 | supply of such sand resources, and the cost of such projects, | 
| 126 | beach or nearshore sand placement is the least-cost disposal | 
| 127 | method. | 
| 128 | (6)  If federal investigations and reports or state- | 
| 129 | approved inlet management plans do not specify the entity or | 
| 130 | entities responsible for the extent of erosion caused by an | 
| 131 | inlet, the department or local government, with the assistance | 
| 132 | of university-based or other contractual resources that they may | 
| 133 | employ or call upon, is encouraged to undertake assessments that | 
| 134 | aid in specifying the responsible entity or entities and in more | 
| 135 | accurately determining cost-sharing responsibilities for | 
| 136 | measures to correct such erosion. The entity that is responsible | 
| 137 | for maintenance dredging of an inlet may be deemed responsible | 
| 138 | for the erosion caused by the inlet if another responsible party | 
| 139 | is not specified in such an assessment, a shore-protection | 
| 140 | project investigation or report, or a state-approved inlet | 
| 141 | management plan. | 
| 142 | (7)  If the beneficiaries of the inlet, the local | 
| 143 | governments having jurisdiction of lands adjacent to the inlet, | 
| 144 | or the owners of property adjacent to the inlet are involved in | 
| 145 | a dispute concerning how much sand should be bypassed, the | 
| 146 | department shall protect its monetary investment in beach | 
| 147 | nourishment projects within the inlet's physical zone of | 
| 148 | influence by taking all reasonable actions to balance the | 
| 149 | sediment budget of the inlet and adjacent beaches, including | 
| 150 | implementation of inlet sand bypassing and other inlet | 
| 151 | management projects. | 
| 152 | Section 2.  Section 161.143, Florida Statutes, is created | 
| 153 | to read: | 
| 154 | 161.143  Inlet management; planning, prioritizing, funding, | 
| 155 | approving, and implementing projects.-- | 
| 156 | (1)  Studies, projects, and activities for the purpose of | 
| 157 | mitigating the erosive effects of inlets and balancing the | 
| 158 | sediment budget of the inlet and adjacent beaches must be | 
| 159 | supported by separately approved inlet management plans or inlet | 
| 160 | components of the statewide comprehensive beach management plan. | 
| 161 | Such plans in support of individual inlet projects or activities | 
| 162 | must, pursuant to s. 161.161(1)(b), evaluate each inlet to | 
| 163 | determine the extent of the inlet's erosive effect on adjacent | 
| 164 | beaches and, if significant, make recommendations to mitigate | 
| 165 | such ongoing erosive effects and provide estimated costs for | 
| 166 | such mitigation. | 
| 167 | (2)  The department shall establish annual funding | 
| 168 | priorities for studies, activities, or other projects concerning | 
| 169 | inlet management. Such inlet management projects include, but | 
| 170 | are not limited to, inlet sand bypassing, modifications to | 
| 171 | channel dredging, jetty redesign, jetty repair, disposal of | 
| 172 | spoil material, and the development, revision, adoption, or | 
| 173 | implementation of an inlet management plan. The funding | 
| 174 | priorities established by the department must be consistent with | 
| 175 | the requirements and legislative declaration in ss. 161.101(14), | 
| 176 | 161.142, and 161.161(1)(b). In establishing funding priorities | 
| 177 | under this subsection and before transmitting the annual inlet | 
| 178 | project list to the Legislature under subsection (5), the | 
| 179 | department shall seek formal input from local coastal | 
| 180 | governments, beach and general government associations and other | 
| 181 | coastal interest groups, and university experts concerning | 
| 182 | annual funding priorities for inlet management projects. In | 
| 183 | order to maximize the benefits of efforts to address the inlet- | 
| 184 | caused beach erosion problems of this state, the ranking | 
| 185 | criteria used by the department to establish funding priorities | 
| 186 | for studies, activities, or other projects concerning inlet | 
| 187 | management must include consideration of: | 
| 188 | (a)  An estimate of the annual quantity of beach-quality | 
| 189 | sand reaching the updrift boundary of the improved jetty or | 
| 190 | inlet channel. | 
| 191 | (b)  The severity of the erosion to the adjacent beaches | 
| 192 | caused by the inlet and the extent to which the proposed project | 
| 193 | mitigates the erosive effects of the inlet. | 
| 194 | (c)  The overall significance and anticipated success of | 
| 195 | the proposed project in balancing the sediment budget of the | 
| 196 | inlet and adjacent beaches and addressing the sand deficit along | 
| 197 | the inlet-affected shorelines. | 
| 198 | (d)  The extent to which existing bypassing activities at | 
| 199 | an inlet would benefit from modest, cost-effective improvements | 
| 200 | when considering the volumetric increases from the proposed | 
| 201 | project, the availability of beach-quality sand currently not | 
| 202 | being bypassed to adjacent eroding beaches, and the ease with | 
| 203 | which such beach-quality sand may be obtained. | 
| 204 | (e)  The interest and commitment of local governments as | 
| 205 | demonstrated by their willingness to coordinate the planning, | 
| 206 | design, construction, and maintenance of an inlet management | 
| 207 | project and their financial plan for funding the local cost- | 
| 208 | share for initial construction, ongoing sand bypassing, channel | 
| 209 | dredging, and maintenance. | 
| 210 | (f)  The previous completion or approval of a state- | 
| 211 | sponsored inlet management plan or local-government-sponsored | 
| 212 | inlet study concerning the inlet addressed by the proposed | 
| 213 | project, the ease of updating and revising any such plan or | 
| 214 | study, and the adequacy and specificity of the plan's or study's | 
| 215 | recommendations concerning the mitigation of an inlet's erosive | 
| 216 | effects on adjacent beaches. | 
| 217 | (g)  The degree to which the proposed project will enhance | 
| 218 | the performance and longevity of proximate beach nourishment | 
| 219 | projects, thereby reducing the frequency of such periodic | 
| 220 | nourishment projects. | 
| 221 | (h)  The project-ranking criteria in s. 161.101(14) to the | 
| 222 | extent such criteria are applicable to inlet management studies, | 
| 223 | projects, and activities. | 
| 224 | (3)  The department may, pursuant to s. 161.101 and | 
| 225 | notwithstanding s. 161.101(15), pay from legislative | 
| 226 | appropriations provided for these purposes 75 percent of the | 
| 227 | total costs, or, if applicable, the nonfederal costs, of a | 
| 228 | study, activity, or other project concerning the management of | 
| 229 | an inlet. The balance must be paid by the local governments or | 
| 230 | special districts having jurisdiction over the property where | 
| 231 | the inlet is located. | 
| 232 | (4)  Using the legislative appropriation to the statewide | 
| 233 | beach-management-support category of the department's fixed | 
| 234 | capital outlay funding request, the department may employ | 
| 235 | university-based or other contractual sources and pay 100 | 
| 236 | percent of the costs of studies that are consistent with the | 
| 237 | legislative declaration in s. 161.142 and that: | 
| 238 | (a)  Determine, calculate, refine, and achieve general | 
| 239 | consensus regarding net annual sediment transport volumes to be | 
| 240 | used for the purpose of planning and prioritizing inlet | 
| 241 | management projects; and | 
| 242 | (b)  Appropriate, assign, and apportion responsibilities | 
| 243 | between inlet beneficiaries for the erosion caused by a | 
| 244 | particular inlet on adjacent beaches. | 
| 245 | (5)  The department shall annually provide an inlet | 
| 246 | management project list, in priority order, to the Legislature | 
| 247 | as part of the department's budget request. The list must | 
| 248 | include studies, projects, or other activities that address the | 
| 249 | management of at least 10 separate inlets and that are ranked | 
| 250 | according to the criteria established under subsection (2). | 
| 251 | (a)  The department shall make available at least 10 | 
| 252 | percent of the total amount that the Legislature appropriates in | 
| 253 | each fiscal year for statewide beach management for the three | 
| 254 | highest-ranked projects on the current year's inlet management | 
| 255 | project list. | 
| 256 | (b)  The department shall make available at least 50 | 
| 257 | percent of the funds appropriated for the feasibility and design | 
| 258 | category in the department's fixed capital outlay funding | 
| 259 | request for projects on the current year's inlet management | 
| 260 | project list which involve the study for, or design or | 
| 261 | development of, an inlet management project. | 
| 262 | (c)  The department shall make available all statewide | 
| 263 | beach management funds that remain unencumbered or are allocated | 
| 264 | to non-project-specific activities for projects on legislatively | 
| 265 | approved inlet management project lists. Funding for local- | 
| 266 | government-specific projects on annual project lists approved by | 
| 267 | the Legislature must remain available for such purposes for a | 
| 268 | period of 18 months pursuant to s. 216.301(2)(a). Based on an | 
| 269 | assessment and the department's determination that a project | 
| 270 | will not be ready to proceed during this 18-month period, such | 
| 271 | funds shall be used for inlet management projects on | 
| 272 | legislatively approved lists. | 
| 273 | (d)  The Legislature shall designate one of the three | 
| 274 | highest projects on the inlet management project list in any | 
| 275 | year as the Inlet of the Year. The department shall annually | 
| 276 | report to the Legislature concerning the extent to which each | 
| 277 | inlet project designated by the Legislature as Inlet of the Year | 
| 278 | has succeeded in balancing the sediment budget of the inlet and | 
| 279 | adjacent beaches, mitigating the inlet's erosive effects on | 
| 280 | adjacent beaches, and transferring or otherwise placing beach- | 
| 281 | quality sand on adjacent eroding beaches. | 
| 282 | (6)  The department shall adopt rules under ss. 120.536(1) | 
| 283 | and 120.54 to administer this section. | 
| 284 | Section 3.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2008. |