HB 481

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act for the relief of Rhonda A. Hughes by Escambia
3County; providing for a county appropriation to compensate
4Rhonda A. Hughes for injuries sustained as a result of the
5negligence of a county employee; providing a limitation on
6the payment of attorney's and lobbying fees and costs;
7providing an effective date.
8
9     WHEREAS, at the time of the incident which resulted in her
10injury, Rhonda A. Hughes was suffering from an undiagnosed
11disease of dysautonomia, a dysfunction of the autonomic nervous
12system that can result in such symptoms as vague but disturbing
13aches and pains; faintness or even fainting spells; fatigue;
14tachycardia; hypotension; sweating; dizziness; blurred vision;
15numbness and tingling; and anxiety and depression, and
16     WHEREAS, on September 25, 2002, Ms. Hughes was in a retail
17store and started to suffer from confusion, dizziness, blurred
18vision, and faintness to such an extent that she sat down on the
19floor, and
20     WHEREAS, the store manager called for emergency medical
21services and an Escambia County emergency medical services
22vehicle was dispatched to Ms. Hughes' location, and
23     WHEREAS, the lead emergency medical technician (EMT) on the
24scene concluded that Ms. Hughes was suffering a possible drug
25overdose and decided that the proper emergency treatment would
26be an injection of naloxone hydrochloride, and
27     WHEREAS, instead of naloxone hydrochloride, the EMT
28injected mivacurium chloride, a paralytic agent that caused Ms.
29Hughes to struggle for her breath almost to the point of
30collapsing into full respiratory arrest, and
31     WHEREAS, approximately 10 minutes elapsed before the EMT
32realized that Ms. Hughes was not breathing sufficiently on her
33own and started artificial ventilation, causing Ms. Hughes to
34suffer from an anoxic brain injury, and
35     WHEREAS, Ms. Hughes filed a lawsuit against Escambia County
36alleging that the EMT was negligent and that the county was
37responsible for the EMT's actions, and the county in its answer
38to the complaint admitted liability for the EMT's negligent
39actions, and
40     WHEREAS, the encephalopathy resulting from the anoxic brain
41injury caused Ms. Hughes to have a loss of cognitive function
42including problems with confusion, memory, concentration, and
43slowed cognitive processing, and
44     WHEREAS, two neurophysiologists who tested Ms. Hughes agree
45that the dysautomony, which is stable and controlled, would not
46cause the type of ongoing cognitive problems that she is
47experiencing and support the opinions of Ms. Hughes'
48psychiatrist and physician, who specializes in treating
49dysautonomia, that her significant cognitive decline is due to
50encephalopathy resulting from the EMT's negligence, and
51     WHEREAS, Ms. Hughes' psychiatrist has opined that her loss
52of cognitive function will require daily ongoing care and
53treatment for the remainder of her life and that the amount of
54care and treatment could increase as she ages, and
55     WHEREAS, Escambia County has agreed to submit to a consent
56judgment for $200,000, of which the county will pay $100,000
57pursuant to the limits of liability set forth in s. 768.28,
58Florida Statutes, and for which the payment of the remainder is
59conditioned upon the passage of a claim bill by the Legislature
60in the amount of $100,000 in favor of Ms. Hughes, NOW,
61THEREFORE,
62
63Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
64
65     Section 1.  The facts stated in the preamble to this act
66are found and declared to be true.
67     Section 2.  Escambia County is authorized and directed to
68appropriate from county funds not otherwise encumbered and draw
69a warrant in the sum of $100,000 payable to Rhonda A. Hughes as
70compensation for injuries and damages sustained due to the
71negligence of an employee of the county, as agreed to by the
72parties in a consent judgment.
73     Section 3.  Any amount paid by the county pursuant to the
74waiver of sovereign immunity permitted under s. 768.28, Florida
75Statutes, and this award is intended to provide the sole
76compensation for all present and future claims arising out of
77the factual situation described in the preamble to this act
78which resulted in the injury to Rhonda A Hughes. The total
79amount paid for attorney's fees, lobbying fees, costs, and other
80similar expenses relating to this claim may not exceed 25
81percent of the amount awarded under section 2 of this act.
82     Section 4.  This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.