Florida Senate - 2009                          SENATOR AMENDMENT
       Bill No. CS for CS for SB 278
       
       
       
       
       
       
                                Barcode 125224                          
       
                              LEGISLATIVE ACTION                        
                    Senate             .             House              
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                 Floor: WD/2R          .                                
             04/23/2009 11:53 AM       .                                
       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————




       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
       Senator Gaetz moved the following:
       
    1         Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
    2  
    3         Between lines 94 and 95
    4  insert:
    5         Section 2. Paragraph (e) of subsection (13) of section
    6  163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
    7         163.3180 Concurrency.—
    8         (13) School concurrency shall be established on a
    9  districtwide basis and shall include all public schools in the
   10  district and all portions of the district, whether located in a
   11  municipality or an unincorporated area unless exempt from the
   12  public school facilities element pursuant to s. 163.3177(12).
   13  The application of school concurrency to development shall be
   14  based upon the adopted comprehensive plan, as amended. All local
   15  governments within a county, except as provided in paragraph
   16  (f), shall adopt and transmit to the state land planning agency
   17  the necessary plan amendments, along with the interlocal
   18  agreement, for a compliance review pursuant to s. 163.3184(7)
   19  and (8). The minimum requirements for school concurrency are the
   20  following:
   21         (e) Availability standard.—Consistent with the public
   22  welfare, a local government may not deny an application for site
   23  plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent
   24  for a development or phase of a development authorizing
   25  residential development for failure to achieve and maintain the
   26  level-of-service standard for public school capacity in a local
   27  school concurrency management system where adequate school
   28  facilities will be in place or under actual construction within
   29  3 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan
   30  approval, or the functional equivalent. School concurrency is
   31  satisfied if the developer executes a legally binding commitment
   32  to provide mitigation proportionate to the demand for public
   33  school facilities to be created by actual development of the
   34  property, including, but not limited to, the options described
   35  in subparagraph 1. Options for proportionate-share mitigation of
   36  impacts on public school facilities must be established in the
   37  public school facilities element and the interlocal agreement
   38  pursuant to s. 163.31777.
   39         1. Appropriate mitigation options include the contribution
   40  of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land
   41  acquisition or construction of a public school facility; the
   42  construction of a charter school that complies with the
   43  requirements of s. 1002.33(18)(f); or the creation of mitigation
   44  banking based on the construction of a public school facility in
   45  exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Such options
   46  must include execution by the applicant and the local government
   47  of a development agreement that constitutes a legally binding
   48  commitment to pay proportionate-share mitigation for the
   49  additional residential units approved by the local government in
   50  a development order and actually developed on the property,
   51  taking into account residential density allowed on the property
   52  prior to the plan amendment that increased the overall
   53  residential density. The district school board must be a party
   54  to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into such a
   55  development agreement, the local government may require the
   56  landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement upon
   57  its expiration.
   58         2. If the education facilities plan and the public
   59  educational facilities element authorize a contribution of land;
   60  the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; or
   61  the construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a
   62  portion thereof; or the construction of a charter school that
   63  complies with the requirements of s. 1002.33(18)(f), as
   64  proportionate-share mitigation, the local government shall
   65  credit such a contribution, construction, expansion, or payment
   66  toward any other impact fee or exaction imposed by local
   67  ordinance for the same need, on a dollar-for-dollar basis at
   68  fair market value.
   69         3. Any proportionate-share mitigation must be directed by
   70  the school board toward a school capacity improvement identified
   71  in a financially feasible 5-year district work plan that
   72  satisfies the demands created by the development in accordance
   73  with a binding developer’s agreement.
   74         4. If a development is precluded from commencing because
   75  there is inadequate classroom capacity to mitigate the impacts
   76  of the development, the development may nevertheless commence if
   77  there are accelerated facilities in an approved capital
   78  improvement element scheduled for construction in year four or
   79  later of such plan which, when built, will mitigate the proposed
   80  development, or if such accelerated facilities will be in the
   81  next annual update of the capital facilities element, the
   82  developer enters into a binding, financially guaranteed
   83  agreement with the school district to construct an accelerated
   84  facility within the first 3 years of an approved capital
   85  improvement plan, and the cost of the school facility is equal
   86  to or greater than the development’s proportionate share. When
   87  the completed school facility is conveyed to the school
   88  district, the developer shall receive impact fee credits usable
   89  within the zone where the facility is constructed or any
   90  attendance zone contiguous with or adjacent to the zone where
   91  the facility is constructed.
   92         5. This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local
   93  government to deny a development permit or its functional
   94  equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except
   95  as provided in this part.
   96  
   97  ================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ================
   98  And the title is amended as follows:
   99  
  100         Delete line 5
  101  and insert:
  102  
  103         provisions to changes made by the act; amending s.
  104  163.3180, F.S.; charter schools as an appropriate mitigation;
  105  amending ss.