| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act relating to petroleum contamination site cleanup; |
| 3 | amending s. 376.3071, F.S.; revising provisions relating |
| 4 | to petroleum contamination site selection and cleanup |
| 5 | criteria; deleting obsolete provisions relating to funding |
| 6 | for limited interim soil-source removals; requiring the |
| 7 | Department of Environmental Protection to utilize natural |
| 8 | attenuation monitoring strategies to transition sites into |
| 9 | long-term natural attenuation monitoring under specified |
| 10 | conditions; providing for natural attenuation and active |
| 11 | remediation of sites; requiring the department to evaluate |
| 12 | certain costs and strategies; prohibiting local |
| 13 | governments from denying development orders and permits on |
| 14 | the grounds that a property is contaminated; providing an |
| 15 | exception; establishing a low-scored site initiative; |
| 16 | providing conditions for participation; requiring the |
| 17 | department to issue certain determinations and orders; |
| 18 | providing that certain sites are eligible for payment of |
| 19 | preapproved costs; requiring assessment work to be |
| 20 | completed within a certain timeframe; providing payment |
| 21 | and funding limitations; deleting provisions relating to |
| 22 | nonreimbursable voluntary cleanup; providing an effective |
| 23 | date. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 | Section 1. Paragraph (c) of subsection (5) and paragraph |
| 28 | (b) of subsection (11) of section 376.3071, Florida Statutes, |
| 29 | are amended to read: |
| 30 | 376.3071 Inland Protection Trust Fund; creation; purposes; |
| 31 | funding.- |
| 32 | (5) SITE SELECTION AND CLEANUP CRITERIA.- |
| 33 | (c) The department shall require source removal, if |
| 34 | warranted and cost-effective, at each site eligible for |
| 35 | restoration funding from the Inland Protection Trust Fund. |
| 36 | 1. Funding for free product recovery may be provided in |
| 37 | advance of the order established by the priority ranking system |
| 38 | under paragraph (a) for site cleanup activities. However, a |
| 39 | separate prioritization for free product recovery shall be |
| 40 | established consistent with paragraph (a). No more than $5 |
| 41 | million shall be encumbered from the Inland Protection Trust |
| 42 | Fund in any fiscal year for free product recovery conducted in |
| 43 | advance of the priority order under paragraph (a) established |
| 44 | for site cleanup activities. |
| 45 | 2. Funding for limited interim soil-source removals for |
| 46 | sites that will become inaccessible for future remediation due |
| 47 | to road infrastructure and right-of-way restrictions resulting |
| 48 | from a pending Department of Transportation road construction |
| 49 | project or for secondary containment upgrading of underground |
| 50 | storage tanks required under chapter 62-761, Florida |
| 51 | Administrative Code, may be provided in advance of the order |
| 52 | established by the priority ranking system under paragraph (a) |
| 53 | for site cleanup activities. The department shall provide |
| 54 | written guidance on the limited source removal information and |
| 55 | technical evaluation necessary to justify a request for a |
| 56 | limited source removal in advance of the priority order pursuant |
| 57 | to paragraph (a) established for site cleanup activities. |
| 58 | Prioritization for limited source removal projects associated |
| 59 | with a secondary containment upgrade in any fiscal year shall be |
| 60 | determined on a first-come, first-served basis according to the |
| 61 | approval date issued under s. 376.30711 for the limited source |
| 62 | removal. Funding for limited source removals associated with |
| 63 | secondary containment upgrades shall be limited to 10 sites in |
| 64 | each fiscal year for each facility owner and any related person. |
| 65 | The limited source removal for secondary containment upgrades |
| 66 | shall be completed no later than 6 months after the department |
| 67 | issues its approval of the project, and the approval |
| 68 | automatically expires at the end of the 6 months. Funding for |
| 69 | Department of Transportation and secondary containment upgrade |
| 70 | source removals may not exceed $50,000 for a single facility |
| 71 | unless the department makes a determination that it is cost- |
| 72 | effective and environmentally beneficial to exceed this amount, |
| 73 | but in no event shall the department authorize costs in excess |
| 74 | of $100,000 for a single facility. Department funding for |
| 75 | limited interim soil-source removals associated with Department |
| 76 | of Transportation projects and secondary containment upgrades |
| 77 | shall be limited to supplemental soil assessment, soil |
| 78 | screening, soil removal, backfill material, treatment or |
| 79 | disposal of the contaminated soil, dewatering related to the |
| 80 | contaminated soil removal in an amount of up to 10 percent of |
| 81 | the total interim soil-source removal project costs, treatment, |
| 82 | and disposal of the contaminated groundwater and preparation of |
| 83 | the source removal report. No other costs associated with the |
| 84 | facility upgrade may be paid with department funds. No more than |
| 85 | $1 million for Department of Transportation limited source |
| 86 | removal projects and $10 million for secondary containment |
| 87 | upgrade limited source removal projects conducted in advance of |
| 88 | the priority order established under paragraph (a) for site |
| 89 | cleanup activities shall be encumbered from the Inland |
| 90 | Protection Trust Fund in any fiscal year. This subparagraph is |
| 91 | repealed effective June 30, 2010. |
| 92 | 2.3. Once free product removal and other source removal |
| 93 | identified in this paragraph are completed at a site, and |
| 94 | notwithstanding the order established by the priority ranking |
| 95 | system under paragraph (a) for site cleanup activities, the |
| 96 | department may reevaluate the site to determine the degree of |
| 97 | active cleanup needed to continue site rehabilitation. Further, |
| 98 | the department shall determine if the reevaluated site qualifies |
| 99 | for natural attenuation monitoring, long-term natural |
| 100 | attenuation monitoring, or no further action. If additional site |
| 101 | rehabilitation is necessary to reach no further action status, |
| 102 | the site rehabilitation shall be conducted in the order |
| 103 | established by the priority ranking system under paragraph (a). |
| 104 | and The department shall is encouraged to utilize natural |
| 105 | attenuation and monitoring strategies and, when cost-effective, |
| 106 | transition sites eligible for restoration funding assistance to |
| 107 | long-term natural attenuation monitoring where the plume is |
| 108 | shrinking or stable and confined to the source property |
| 109 | boundaries and the petroleum products' chemicals of concern meet |
| 110 | the natural attenuation default concentrations, as defined by |
| 111 | department rule. If the plume migrates beyond the source |
| 112 | property boundaries, natural attenuation monitoring may be |
| 113 | conducted in accordance with department rule, or if the site no |
| 114 | longer qualifies for natural attenuation monitoring, active |
| 115 | remediation may be resumed. If the petroleum products' chemicals |
| 116 | of concern increase or are not significantly reduced after 42 |
| 117 | months of monitoring, active remediation shall be resumed as |
| 118 | necessary. For sites undergoing active remediation, the |
| 119 | department shall evaluate the cost of natural attenuation |
| 120 | monitoring pursuant to s. 376.30711 to ensure that site |
| 121 | mobilizations are performed in a cost-effective manner. Sites |
| 122 | that are not eligible for state restoration funding may |
| 123 | transition to long-term natural attenuation monitoring using the |
| 124 | criteria in this subparagraph. Nothing in this subparagraph |
| 125 | precludes a site from pursuing a "No Further Action" order with |
| 126 | conditions where site conditions warrant. |
| 127 | 3. The department shall evaluate whether higher natural |
| 128 | attenuation default concentrations for natural attenuation |
| 129 | monitoring or long-term natural attenuation monitoring are cost- |
| 130 | effective and would adequately protect public health and the |
| 131 | environment. The department shall also evaluate site-specific |
| 132 | characteristics that would allow for higher natural attenuation |
| 133 | or long-term natural attenuation concentration levels. |
| 134 | 4. Unless institutional controls have been imposed by the |
| 135 | responsible party or property owner to restrict the uses of the |
| 136 | site, a local government may not deny a development order or |
| 137 | other permit on the grounds that petroleum contamination exists |
| 138 | onsite. |
| 139 | (11) |
| 140 | (b) Low-scored site initiative Nonreimbursable voluntary |
| 141 | cleanup.-Notwithstanding s. 376.30711, any site For sites with |
| 142 | releases reported prior to January 1, 1995, the department shall |
| 143 | issue a determination of "No Further Action" at sites ranked |
| 144 | with a total priority ranking score of 10 points or less may |
| 145 | voluntarily participate in the low-scored site initiative, |
| 146 | whether or not the site is eligible for state restoration |
| 147 | funding. |
| 148 | 1. To participate in the low-scored site initiative, the |
| 149 | responsible party or property owner must affirmatively |
| 150 | demonstrate that, which meet the following conditions are met: |
| 151 | a.1. Upon reassessment pursuant to department rule, the |
| 152 | site retains a priority ranking score of 10 points or less No |
| 153 | free product exists in wells, boreholes, subsurface utility |
| 154 | conduits, or vaults or buildings and no other fire or explosion |
| 155 | hazard exists as a result of a release of petroleum products. |
| 156 | b.2. No excessively contaminated soil, as defined by |
| 157 | department rule, exists onsite as a result of a release of |
| 158 | petroleum products. |
| 159 | c.3. A minimum of 6 months of groundwater monitoring |
| 160 | indicates that the plume is shrinking or stable Public supply |
| 161 | wells for consumptive use of water expected to be affected by |
| 162 | the site shall not be located within a 1/2-mile radius of the |
| 163 | site; private supply wells for consumptive use of water expected |
| 164 | to be affected by the site shall not be located within a 1/4- |
| 165 | mile radius of the site; and there must be no current or |
| 166 | projected consumptive use of the water affected by the site for |
| 167 | at least the following 3 years. Where appropriate, institutional |
| 168 | controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph (5)(b)4. may |
| 169 | be required by the department to meet these criteria. |
| 170 | d.4. The release of petroleum products at the site does |
| 171 | shall not adversely affect adjacent surface waters, including |
| 172 | their effects on human health and the environment. |
| 173 | e.5. The area of groundwater containing the petroleum |
| 174 | products' chemicals of concern in concentrations greater than |
| 175 | the boundary values defined in subparagraph 7. is less than one- |
| 176 | quarter acre and is confined to the source property boundaries |
| 177 | of the real property on which the discharge originated. |
| 178 | f.6. Soils onsite that are subject to human exposure found |
| 179 | between land surface and 2 feet below land surface shall meet |
| 180 | the soil cleanup target levels criteria established by |
| 181 | department rule or human exposure is limited by pursuant to sub- |
| 182 | subparagraph (5)(b)9.a. Where appropriate, institutional or |
| 183 | engineering controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph |
| 184 | (5)(b)4. may be required by the department to meet these |
| 185 | criteria. |
| 186 | 2. Upon affirmative demonstration of the conditions under |
| 187 | subparagraph 1., the department shall issue a determination of |
| 188 | "No Further Action." Such determination acknowledges that |
| 189 | minimal contamination exists onsite and that such contamination |
| 190 | is not a threat to human health or the environment. If no |
| 191 | contamination is detected, the department may issue a site |
| 192 | rehabilitation completion order. |
| 193 | 3. Sites that are eligible for state restoration funding |
| 194 | may receive payment of preapproved costs for the low-scored site |
| 195 | initiative as follows: |
| 196 | a. A responsible party or property owner may submit an |
| 197 | assessment plan designed to affirmatively demonstrate that the |
| 198 | site meets the conditions under subparagraph 1. Notwithstanding |
| 199 | the priority ranking score of the site, the department may |
| 200 | preapprove the cost of the assessment pursuant to s. 376.30711, |
| 201 | including 6 months of groundwater monitoring, not to exceed |
| 202 | $30,000 for each site. The department may not pay the costs |
| 203 | associated with the establishment of institutional or |
| 204 | engineering controls. |
| 205 | b. The assessment work shall be completed no later than 6 |
| 206 | months after the department issues its approval. |
| 207 | c. No more than $10 million for the low-scored site |
| 208 | initiative shall be encumbered from the Inland Protection Trust |
| 209 | Fund in any fiscal year. Funds shall be made available on a |
| 210 | first-come, first-served basis and shall be limited to 10 sites |
| 211 | in each fiscal year for each responsible party or property |
| 212 | owner. |
| 213 | 7. Concentrations of the petroleum products' chemicals of |
| 214 | concern in groundwater at the property boundary of the real |
| 215 | property on which the petroleum contamination originates shall |
| 216 | not exceed the criteria established pursuant to sub-subparagraph |
| 217 | (5)(b)7.a. Where appropriate, institutional or engineering |
| 218 | controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph (5)(b)4. may |
| 219 | be required by the department to meet these criteria. |
| 220 | 8. The department is authorized to establish alternate |
| 221 | cleanup target levels for onsite nonboundary wells pursuant to |
| 222 | the criteria in subparagraph (5)(b)8. |
| 223 | 9. A scientific evaluation that demonstrates that the |
| 224 | boundary criteria in subparagraph 7. will not be exceeded and a |
| 225 | 1-year site-specific groundwater monitoring plan approved in |
| 226 | advance by the department validates the scientific evaluation. |
| 227 | If the boundary criteria in subparagraph 7. are exceeded at any |
| 228 | time, the department may order an extension of the monitoring |
| 229 | period for up to 12 additional months from the time of the |
| 230 | excess reading. The department shall determine the adequacy of |
| 231 | the groundwater monitoring system at a site. All wells required |
| 232 | by the department pursuant to this paragraph shall be installed |
| 233 | before the monitoring period begins. |
| 234 | 10. Costs associated with activities performed pursuant to |
| 235 | this paragraph for sites which qualify for a determination of |
| 236 | "No Further Action" under this paragraph shall not be |
| 237 | reimbursable from the Inland Protection Trust Fund. |
| 238 | Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2010. |