| 1 | House Memorial | 
| 2 | A memorial to the Congress of the United States, urging  | 
| 3 | Congress to keep the United States Environmental  | 
| 4 | Protection Agency from overextending its mandate and to  | 
| 5 | direct the agency not to intrude into Florida's previously  | 
| 6 | approved clean water program. | 
| 7 | 
  | 
| 8 |      WHEREAS, on December 7, 2010, the State of Florida filed a  | 
| 9 | lawsuit against the United States Environmental Protection  | 
| 10 | Agency over federal intrusion into Florida's clean water  | 
| 11 | program, and | 
| 12 |      WHEREAS, the lawsuit alleges that the agency's action is  | 
| 13 | inconsistent with the intent of Congress when it based the Clean  | 
| 14 | Water Act on the idea of cooperative federalism whereby the  | 
| 15 | states would be responsible for the control of water quality  | 
| 16 | with oversight by the agency, and | 
| 17 |      WHEREAS, the control of nutrient loading from predominately  | 
| 18 | nonpoint sources involves traditional states' rights and  | 
| 19 | responsibilities for water and land resource management, which  | 
| 20 | Congress expressly intended to preserve in the Clean Water Act,  | 
| 21 | and | 
| 22 |      WHEREAS, the lawsuit specifically alleges that the agency's  | 
| 23 | rule and its January 2009 necessity determination for adopting  | 
| 24 | numeric nutrient water quality criteria for Florida's waters  | 
| 25 | were arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion, and  | 
| 26 | requests the court to enjoin the agency's administrator from  | 
| 27 | implementing the numeric water quality criteria for Florida in  | 
| 28 | the rule, and | 
| 29 |      WHEREAS, prior to the agency's announcement that it would  | 
| 30 | be implementing new rules for Florida, the state had been  | 
| 31 | diligently working through its Total Maximum Daily Load Program  | 
| 32 | to adopt numeric standards for impaired bodies of water, and | 
| 33 |      WHEREAS, the agency had already approved Florida's Total  | 
| 34 | Maximum Daily Load Program on the basis that it was sufficient  | 
| 35 | to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act, as referenced  | 
| 36 | in a letter dated September 28, 2007, and | 
| 37 |      WHEREAS, as recently as January 2010, the agency praised  | 
| 38 | Florida for implementing "some of the most progressive nutrient  | 
| 39 | management strategies in the nation," and the Total Maximum  | 
| 40 | Daily Load Program had a timetable for implementation through  | 
| 41 | 2011, and | 
| 42 |      WHEREAS, despite the fact that Florida was working to  | 
| 43 | implement its approved program and was seeing successes, the  | 
| 44 | agency reversed its determinations in 2009 and informed the  | 
| 45 | state that new federal rules and criteria would be developed and  | 
| 46 | implemented by the agency, preempting the approved state  | 
| 47 | program, and | 
| 48 |      WHEREAS, according to the state's lawsuit, the agency has  | 
| 49 | continued to rely on a methodology that is neither  | 
| 50 | scientifically sound nor site specific for Florida's waters, and | 
| 51 |      WHEREAS, in April, the agency's own Science Advisory Board  | 
| 52 | joined the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the  | 
| 53 | Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the  | 
| 54 | University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural  | 
| 55 | Sciences, the Florida Legislature, and others in expressing  | 
| 56 | serious concerns that the agency's methods for developing  | 
| 57 | numeric nutrient water quality criteria are scientifically  | 
| 58 | flawed, and | 
| 59 |      WHEREAS, the State of Florida has significant concerns with  | 
| 60 | regard to the cost of implementing the new numeric nutrient  | 
| 61 | water quality criteria proposed by the agency, NOW, THEREFORE, | 
| 62 | 
  | 
| 63 | Be It Resolved by the Legislature of the State of Florida: | 
| 64 | 
  | 
| 65 |      That the Congress of the United States is urged to keep the  | 
| 66 | United States Environmental Protection Agency from overextending  | 
| 67 | its mandate and to direct the agency not to intrude into  | 
| 68 | Florida's previously approved clean water program. | 
| 69 |      BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be  | 
| 70 | dispatched to the President of the United States, to the  | 
| 71 | President of the United States Senate, to the Speaker of the  | 
| 72 | United States House of Representatives, and to each member of  | 
| 73 | the Florida delegation to the United States Congress. |