Amendment
Bill No. CS/HB 7129
Amendment No. 691487
CHAMBER ACTION
Senate House
.
.
.






1Representative Workman offered the following:
2
3     Amendment
4     Remove lines 1491-1607 and insert:
5     (b)  A transportation element addressing mobility issues in
6relationship to the size and character of the local government.
7The purpose of the transportation element shall be to plan for a
8multimodal transportation system that places emphasis on public
9transportation systems, where feasible. The element shall
10provide for a safe, convenient multimodal transportation system,
11coordinated with the future land use map or map series and
12designed to support all elements of the comprehensive plan. A
13local government that has all or part of its jurisdiction
14included within the metropolitan planning area of a metropolitan
15planning organization (M.P.O.) pursuant to s. 339.175 shall
16prepare and adopt a transportation element consistent with this
17subsection. Local governments that are not located within the
18metropolitan planning area of an M.P.O. shall address traffic
19circulation, mass transit, and ports, and aviation and related
20facilities consistent with this subsection, except that local
21governments with a population of 50,000 or less shall only be
22required to address transportation circulation. The element
23shall be coordinated with the plans and programs of any
24applicable metropolitan planning organization, transportation
25authority, Florida Transportation Plan, and Department of
26Transportation's adopted work program.
27     1.  Each local government's transportation element shall
28address
29     (b)  A traffic circulation, including element consisting of
30the types, locations, and extent of existing and proposed major
31thoroughfares and transportation routes, including bicycle and
32pedestrian ways. Transportation corridors, as defined in s.
33334.03, may be designated in the transportation traffic
34circulation element pursuant to s. 337.273. If the
35transportation corridors are designated, the local government
36may adopt a transportation corridor management ordinance. The
37element shall include a map or map series showing the general
38location of the existing and proposed transportation system
39features and shall be coordinated with the future land use map
40or map series. The element shall reflect the data, analysis, and
41associated principles and strategies relating to:
42     a.  The existing transportation system levels of service
43and system needs and the availability of transportation
44facilities and services.
45     b.  The growth trends and travel patterns and interactions
46between land use and transportation.
47     c.  Existing and projected intermodal deficiencies and
48needs.
49     d.  The projected transportation system levels of service
50and system needs based upon the future land use map and the
51projected integrated transportation system.
52     e.  How the local government will correct existing facility
53deficiencies, meet the identified needs of the projected
54transportation system, and advance the purpose of this paragraph
55and the other elements of the comprehensive plan.
56     2.  Local governments within a metropolitan planning area
57designated as an M.P.O. pursuant to s. 339.175 shall also
58address:
59     a.  All alternative modes of travel, such as public
60transportation, pedestrian, and bicycle travel.
61     b.  Aviation, rail, seaport facilities, access to those
62facilities, and intermodal terminals.
63     c.  The capability to evacuate the coastal population
64before an impending natural disaster.
65     d.  Airports, projected airport and aviation development,
66and land use compatibility around airports, which includes areas
67defined in ss. 333.01 and 333.02.
68     e.  An identification of land use densities, building
69intensities, and transportation management programs to promote
70public transportation systems in designated public
71transportation corridors so as to encourage population densities
72sufficient to support such systems.
73     3.  Municipalities having populations greater than 50,000,
74and counties having populations greater than 75,000, shall
75include mass-transit provisions showing proposed methods for the
76moving of people, rights-of-way, terminals, and related
77facilities and shall address:
78     a.  The provision of efficient public transit services
79based upon existing and proposed major trip generators and
80attractors, safe and convenient public transit terminals, land
81uses, and accommodation of the special needs of the
82transportation disadvantaged.
83     b.  Plans for port, aviation, and related facilities
84coordinated with the general circulation and transportation
85element.
86     c.  Plans for the circulation of recreational traffic,
87including bicycle facilities, exercise trails, riding
88facilities, and such other matters as may be related to the
89improvement and safety of movement of all types of recreational
90traffic.
91     4.  At the option of a local government, an airport master
92plan, and any subsequent amendments to the airport master plan,
93prepared by a licensed publicly owned and operated airport under
94s. 333.06 may be incorporated into the local government
95comprehensive plan by the local government having jurisdiction
96under this act for the area in which the airport or projected
97airport development is located by the adoption of a
98comprehensive plan amendment. In the amendment to the local
99comprehensive plan that integrates the airport master plan, the
100comprehensive plan amendment shall address land use
101compatibility consistent with chapter 333 regarding airport
102zoning; the provision of regional transportation facilities for
103the efficient use and operation of the transportation system and
104airport; consistency with the local government transportation
105circulation element and applicable M.P.O. long-range
106transportation plans; the execution of any necessary interlocal
107agreements for the purposes of the provision of public
108facilities and services to maintain the adopted level-of-service
109standards for facilities subject to concurrency; and may address
110airport-related or aviation-related development. Development or
111expansion of an airport consistent with the adopted airport
112master plan that has been incorporated into the local
113comprehensive plan in compliance with this part, and airport-
114related or aviation-related development that has been addressed
115in the comprehensive plan amendment that incorporates the
116airport master plan, do not constitute a development of regional
117impact. Notwithstanding any other general law, an airport that
118has received a development-of-regional-impact development order
119pursuant to s. 380.06, but which is no longer required to
120undergo development-of-regional-impact review pursuant to this
121subsection, may rescind its development-of-regional-impact order
122upon written notification to the applicable local government.
123Upon receipt by the local government, the development-of-
124regional-impact development order shall be deemed rescinded. The
125traffic circulation
126


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.