| 1 | Representative Workman offered the following: | 
| 2 | 
 | 
| 3 | Amendment | 
| 4 | Remove lines 6687-6750 and insert: | 
| 5 | 7. 5.Detailed analysis and identification of specific | 
| 6 | measures to ensure assurethe protection and, as appropriate, | 
| 7 | restoration and management of lands within the boundary of the | 
| 8 | detailed specific area plan identified for permanent | 
| 9 | preservation through recordation of conservation easements | 
| 10 | consistent with s. 704.06, which easements shall be effective | 
| 11 | before or concurrent with the effective date of the detailed | 
| 12 | specific area plan of regionally significant natural resources  | 
| 13 | and other important resources both within and outside the host | 
| 14 | jurisdiction , including those regionally significant resources  | 
| 15 | identified in chapter 9J-2, Florida Administrative Code. | 
| 16 | 8. 6.Detailed principles and guidelines addressingthat  | 
| 17 | addressthe urban form and the interrelationships ofanticipated  | 
| 18 | future land uses; and a discussion, at the applicant's option,  | 
| 19 | of the extent, if any, to which the plan will address restoring  | 
| 20 | key ecosystems,achieving a more clean, healthy environment;,  | 
| 21 | limiting urban sprawl; providing a range of housing types; , | 
| 22 | protecting wildlife and natural areas; ,advancing the efficient | 
| 23 | use of land and other resources; , andcreating quality | 
| 24 | communities of a design that promotes travel by multiple | 
| 25 | transportation modes; and enhancing the prospects for the | 
| 26 | creation of jobs. | 
| 27 | 9. 7.Identification of specific procedures to facilitate | 
| 28 | ensureintergovernmental coordination to address | 
| 29 | extrajurisdictional impacts from ofthe detailed specific area | 
| 30 | plan. | 
| 31 | 
 | 
| 32 | A detailed specific area plan adopted by local development order | 
| 33 | pursuant to this section may be based upon a planning period | 
| 34 | longer than the generally applicable planning period of the | 
| 35 | local comprehensive plan and shall specify the projected | 
| 36 | population within the specific planning area during the chosen | 
| 37 | planning period. A detailed specific area plan adopted pursuant | 
| 38 | to this section is not required to demonstrate need based upon | 
| 39 | projected population growth or on any other basis. All lands | 
| 40 | identified in the long-term master plan for permanent | 
| 41 | preservation shall be subject to a recorded conservation | 
| 42 | easement consistent with s. 704.06 before or concurrent with the | 
| 43 | effective date of the final detailed specific area plan to be | 
| 44 | approved within the planning area. | 
| 45 | (c)  In its review of a long-term master plan, the state | 
| 46 | land planning agency shall consult with the Department of | 
| 47 | Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department of | 
| 48 | Environmental Protection, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation | 
| 49 | Commission, and the applicable water management district | 
| 50 | regarding the design of areas for protection and conservation of | 
| 51 | regionally significant natural resources and for the protection | 
| 52 | and, as appropriate, restoration and management of lands | 
| 53 | identified for permanent preservation. | 
| 54 | (d)  In its review of a long-term master plan, the state | 
| 55 | land planning agency shall consult with the Department of | 
| 56 | Transportation, the applicable metropolitan planning | 
| 57 | organization, and any urban transit agency regarding the | 
| 58 | location, capacity, design, and phasing or staging of major | 
| 59 | transportation facilities in the planning area. | 
| 60 | (e)  Whenever a local government issues a development order | 
| 61 | approving a detailed specific area plan, a copy of such order | 
| 62 | shall be rendered to the state land planning agency and the | 
| 63 | owner or developer of the property affected by such order, as | 
| 64 | prescribed by rules of the state land planning agency for a | 
| 65 | development order for a development of regional impact. Within | 
| 66 | 45 days after the order is rendered, the owner, the developer, | 
| 67 | or the state land planning agency may appeal the order to the | 
| 68 | Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission by filing a | 
| 69 | petition alleging that the detailed specific area plan is not | 
| 70 | consistent with the comprehensive plan or with the long-term | 
| 71 | master plan adopted pursuant to this section. The appellant | 
| 72 | shall furnish a copy of the petition to the opposing party, as | 
| 73 | the case may be, and to the local government that issued the | 
| 74 | order. The filing of the petition stays the effectiveness of the | 
| 75 | order until after completion of the appeal process. However, if | 
| 76 | a development order approving a detailed specific area plan has | 
| 77 | been challenged by an aggrieved or adversely affected party in a | 
| 78 | judicial proceeding pursuant to s. 163.3215, and a party to such | 
| 79 | proceeding serves notice to the state land planning agency, the | 
| 80 | state land planning agency shall dismiss its appeal to the | 
| 81 | commission and shall have the right to intervene in the pending | 
| 82 | judicial proceeding pursuant to s. 163.3215. Proceedings for | 
| 83 | administrative review of an order approving a detailed specific | 
| 84 | area plan shall be conducted consistent with s. 380.07(6). The | 
| 85 | commission shall issue a decision granting or denying permission | 
| 86 | to develop pursuant to the long-term master plan and the | 
| 87 | standards of this part and may attach conditions or restrictions | 
| 88 | to its decisions. | 
| 89 | 
 |