Florida Senate - 2017 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for SB 582
Ì686042ÈÎ686042
LEGISLATIVE ACTION
Senate . House
Comm: RCS .
03/28/2017 .
.
.
.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
The Committee on Judiciary (Latvala) recommended the following:
1 Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
2
3 Delete lines 31 - 96
4 and insert:
5 the Legislature. The department, by way of departmental
6 officials who are not active market participants, shall review
7 each final board decision for anticompetitive conduct and, based
8 on its findings, shall issue an order constituting state action
9 approving, modifying, or voiding the decision. The department’s
10 anticompetitive review constitutes a limited legal review and
11 its resulting determination is not subject to legal challenge.
12 For purposes of this paragraph, the term “final board decisions”
13 includes final orders for disciplinary actions, declaratory
14 statements, actions concerning unlicensed activity, licensure
15 application denials, and rulemaking.
16 (b) Legal costs for defense of antitrust actions brought
17 against boards or board members shall be paid out of the
18 Professional Regulation Trust Fund.
19 Section 2. Subsection (12) is added to section 456.004,
20 Florida Statutes, to read:
21 456.004 Department; powers and duties.—The department, for
22 the professions under its jurisdiction, shall:
23 (12)(a) Determine whether final board decisions constitute
24 anticompetitive conduct that does not promote state policy, does
25 not comport with the standards established by the Legislature,
26 or does not comport with the authority delegated to a board by
27 the Legislature. The department, by way of departmental
28 officials who are not active market participants, shall review
29 each final board decision for anticompetitive conduct and, based
30 on its findings, shall issue an order constituting state action
31 approving, modifying, or voiding the decision. The department’s
32 anticompetitive review constitutes a limited legal review and
33 its resulting determination is not subject to legal challenge.
34 For purposes of this paragraph, the term “final board decisions”
35 includes final orders for disciplinary actions, declaratory
36 statements, actions concerning unlicensed activity, licensure
37 application denials, and rulemaking.
38 (b) Legal costs for defense of antitrust actions brought
39 against boards or board members shall be paid out of the Medical
40 Quality Assurance Trust Fund.
41 Section 3. Paragraph (e) is added to subsection (7) of
42 section 497.103, Florida Statutes, to read:
43 497.103 Authority of board and department; Chief Financial
44 Officer recommendations.—
45 (7) ACTIONS BY BOARD AND DEPARTMENT.—
46 (e)1. The department shall determine whether final board
47 decisions constitute anticompetitive conduct that does not
48 promote state policy, does not comport with the standards
49 established by the Legislature, or does not comport with the
50 authority delegated to a board by the Legislature. The
51 department, by way of departmental officials who are not active
52 market participants, shall review each final board decision for
53 anticompetitive conduct and, based on its findings, shall issue
54 an order constituting state action approving, modifying, or
55 voiding the decision. The department’s anticompetitive review
56 constitutes a limited legal review and its resulting
57 determination is not subject to legal challenge. For purposes of
58 this paragraph, the term “final board decisions” includes final
59 orders for disciplinary actions, declaratory statements, actions
60 concerning unlicensed activity, licensure application denials,
61 and rulemaking.
62 2. Legal costs for defense of antitrust actions brought
63 against boards or board members shall be paid out of the
64 Regulatory Trust Fund.
65
66 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================
67 And the title is amended as follows:
68 Delete lines 11 - 18
69 and insert:
70 voiding each decision; specifying that the
71 departments’ anticompetitive review constitutes a
72 limited legal review and its resulting determination
73 is not subject to legal challenge; specifying actions
74 that are considered final board decisions; requiring
75 that legal costs for defense of antitrust actions and
76 financial damages be paid from specified accounts;
77 providing