Florida Senate - 2024                               (NP)    SB 2
       
       
        
       By Senator Rodriguez
       
       
       
       
       
       40-00031-24                                              20242__
    1                        A bill to be entitled                      
    2         An act for the relief of Patricia Ermini by the Lee
    3         County Sheriff’s Office; providing for an
    4         appropriation to compensate her for injuries sustained
    5         as a result of the negligence of the Lee County
    6         Sheriff’s Office; providing a limitation on the
    7         payment of attorney fees; providing an effective date.
    8  
    9         WHEREAS, on the evening of March 23, 2012, 71-year-old
   10  Patricia Ermini spoke on the telephone with her daughter, Robin
   11  Lacasse, who found that her mother was extremely upset in the
   12  wake of her contentious and expensive divorce after a brief
   13  marriage, and
   14         WHEREAS, Ms. Lacasse suggested to her mother that she hang
   15  up, take some time to calm down, and, afterward, call her back,
   16  which her mother did; however, Ms. Lacasse missed her mother’s
   17  call, and
   18         WHEREAS, when Ms. Ermini failed to reach her daughter, she
   19  went to bed in her bedroom, which was being cooled by a window
   20  unit air conditioner, and
   21         WHEREAS, over the course of half an hour, Ms. Lacasse
   22  repeatedly tried to return her mother’s call and, when her
   23  mother did not answer, called the Lee County Sheriff’s Office
   24  (LCSO) to request that a well-being check be conducted to
   25  determine whether her mother was safe, and
   26         WHEREAS, shortly before 9 p.m., LCSO dispatch relayed the
   27  call for a well-being check to Deputy Charlene Palmese, with
   28  Deputies Richard Lisenbee and Robert Hamer also responding to
   29  the call, conveying the following information to the deputies:
   30  Ms. Ermini’s name and age; that the request for a well-being
   31  check had been initiated by Ms. Ermini’s daughter, who did not
   32  reside in Lee County and was afraid for her mother’s life; that
   33  Ms. Ermini was in the middle of a difficult divorce; that Ms.
   34  Ermini had told her daughter that she “couldn’t take it
   35  anymore”; that Ms. Ermini’s daughter was worried that Ms. Ermini
   36  might commit suicide; that Ms. Ermini had never threatened
   37  suicide before; that Ms. Ermini did not suffer from mental
   38  illness; and that Ms. Ermini had a gun and might have been
   39  drinking, and
   40         WHEREAS, at the time of the call, Deputy Lisenbee was on
   41  probation and undergoing remedial training, in part because of
   42  his demonstrated inability to control scenes or suspects through
   43  verbal commands, and he later told investigators that he could
   44  not recall receiving training in the conduct of well-being
   45  checks, and
   46         WHEREAS, Deputy Palmese had completed her field training
   47  only a few days prior to the call, during which she received
   48  instruction on how to respond to a well-being check, but she
   49  later told investigators that she could not recall whether, at
   50  the time of the call, she had ever actually participated in a
   51  well-being check, and
   52         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer had been to many suicide threat
   53  calls, and he made it a practice to carry his rifle when it was
   54  known that a firearm was present on the premises where the
   55  subject of the call was located, and
   56         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee, who was the first to arrive at
   57  Ms. Ermini’s home in response to the call, observed that there
   58  were no lights on in the home when he arrived and, after a brief
   59  exterior check, went to the front door, where he secured a
   60  screen door in the open position, knocked on the door, and
   61  announced, “Sheriff’s Office,” to no response, and
   62         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee determined that the front door was
   63  unlocked, opened the door, and again said, “Sheriff’s Office,”
   64  followed by “Anyone here? Anyone home?” to no response, and
   65         WHEREAS, Deputy Palmese was second to arrive, followed by
   66  Deputy Hamer, who, like the other deputies, parked out of view
   67  from inside the residence, and
   68         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer retrieved from the trunk of his
   69  vehicle his AR-15 rifle, which was equipped with a flashlight
   70  and a sighting device that allowed him to find his target more
   71  quickly and easily, and
   72         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer determined that the three deputies,
   73  all of whom were wearing dark green uniforms, should go into the
   74  residence to clear the house, and
   75         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer activated the flashlight on his rifle
   76  and Deputy Lisenbee announced “Sheriff’s Office” once or twice
   77  more before they entered the home, after which they proceeded to
   78  move about the dark residence in silence as they cleared the
   79  living room, finally arriving at the master bedroom, which had
   80  double doors, both of which were closed, and
   81         WHEREAS, without knocking or further announcing their
   82  presence, Deputy Lisenbee opened the right-hand bedroom door and
   83  shined his flashlight on a female, who appeared to be asleep on
   84  the bed wearing only undergarments, and
   85         WHEREAS, after Deputy Lisenbee entered the bedroom doorway,
   86  he announced, “Sheriff’s Office. Are you okay?” to which the
   87  woman responded, “Who’s there? Who’s there?”, and
   88         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee said, “Sheriff’s Office. We’re
   89  here to make sure you’re okay. Are you okay?”, and
   90         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee said that, although the woman may
   91  have sounded frightened, he did not temper his tone, nor did he
   92  ever shine his flashlight on himself to allow Ms. Ermini to see
   93  that he was, in fact, a uniformed officer, and
   94         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer said he heard Ms. Ermini say, “What
   95  are you doing here? I have a gun,” and
   96         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer later acknowledged that he didn’t
   97  know whether Ms. Ermini had heard or understood Deputy Lisenbee,
   98  yet nonetheless, he turned off the flashlight on his gun, “took
   99  the point,” and stepped in front of Deputy Lisenbee because, he
  100  said, he had more weaponry, was the senior officer on scene, and
  101  had significantly more gun range time, and
  102         WHEREAS, terrified, Ms. Ermini told the person at the
  103  doorway, whom she perceived as an intruder, to get out of her
  104  house “because (she had) a gun” and, with that, jumped up from
  105  the bed and hid behind the still-closed left-hand bedroom door,
  106  and
  107         WHEREAS, it remains unclear whether Ms. Ermini grabbed her
  108  gun as she ran to shelter behind the door, and
  109         WHEREAS, as Ms. Ermini tried to look around the bedroom
  110  door, she was shot multiple times, with Deputy Hamer firing
  111  seven rounds from his rifle through the closed bedroom door, and
  112         WHEREAS, according to the chief crime scene investigator, a
  113  bullet fired through the middle of the door struck Ms. Ermini in
  114  her left leg, shattering her femur and causing her to fall
  115  backward onto the floor; another bullet hit her in the upper
  116  right arm, leaving a portion of her upper arm missing; and a
  117  third bullet caused a graze wound across the back of her head,
  118  and
  119         WHEREAS, a wood splinter from the door lodged in her right
  120  eye, temporarily blinding her in that eye, and
  121         WHEREAS, it was less than two minutes from the time of
  122  entry until Ms. Ermini was shot multiple times and fell to the
  123  floor, and
  124         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer notified dispatch of the shooting and
  125  continued to sweep the bedroom before finally delivering first
  126  aid to Ms. Ermini, whom he handcuffed because she was still
  127  alive and therefore posed a continuing threat to the deputies,
  128  and
  129         WHEREAS, Lee County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was
  130  dispatched at the same time as the officers and were waiting
  131  just two blocks away, which likely saved Ms. Ermini’s life, and
  132         WHEREAS, when the lead paramedic for EMS arrived, he
  133  determined that Ms. Ermini had life-threatening injuries to the
  134  front and back of her left leg and to the front and back of her
  135  right arm, and a laceration to the back of her head just above
  136  the neckline, and
  137         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini repeatedly asked the paramedic why she
  138  had been shot, who the intruders were, and why they were in her
  139  home, and
  140         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini’s most grievous injury was the
  141  shattered femur in her left leg, and moving her caused her
  142  significant blood loss and excruciating pain, and
  143         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini was taken to Lee Memorial Hospital in
  144  critical condition and later admitted to the intensive care
  145  unit, and
  146         WHEREAS, in addition to the gunshot wounds, Ms. Ermini had
  147  numerous wounds on her face from the wood splinters from the
  148  bedroom door, and
  149         WHEREAS, an LCSO lieutenant who followed the ambulance to
  150  the hospital initially refused the emergency room doctor’s
  151  request to remove the handcuffs from Ms. Ermini; emergency room
  152  staff were told that Ms. Ermini “tried to kill a cop”; and Ms.
  153  Ermini’s family members were denied visitation, and
  154         WHEREAS, doctors were able to save Ms. Ermini’s eye with
  155  surgery, but her vision has deteriorated since the incident, and
  156         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini required multiple surgeries to repair
  157  her femur and address her wounds, including multiple skin grafts
  158  on her shoulder, and
  159         WHEREAS, after discharge, she suffered a severe septic
  160  infection that caused her tremendous pain, and the pain
  161  medications she was prescribed induced debilitating paranoia,
  162  and
  163         WHEREAS, on March 24, 2012, Sheriff Mike Scott told the
  164  news media that Ms. Ermini shot at deputies who had responded to
  165  a well-being check and that they returned fire, which directly
  166  contradicts Deputy Hamer’s statement, in which he indicated that
  167  he shot first, and
  168         WHEREAS, on March 29, 2012, Ms. Ermini was arrested in the
  169  intensive care unit on two counts of aggravated assault on a law
  170  enforcement officer, which the state attorney declined to
  171  prosecute, and
  172         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini was an emergency room nurse in South
  173  Florida for many years and had worked hand-in-hand with law
  174  enforcement officers, no evidence was ever produced that she had
  175  any animus toward law enforcement officers, and it is still
  176  disputed that Ms. Ermini’s weapon was discharged during the
  177  encounter, and
  178         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini remained hospitalized for about 30 days
  179  and has never fully recovered from her injuries, and
  180         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini continues to suffer from acute pain and
  181  fatigue and limited range of motion due to the gunshot wound to
  182  her upper arm, which impairs her ability to accomplish many of
  183  the activities of daily living, and she suffers from
  184  debilitating posttraumatic stress disorder, and
  185         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini was forced to sell her home because she
  186  cannot afford in-home assistance, and
  187         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee and Deputy Hamer were terminated
  188  by the LCSO shortly after the incident, the latter for “conduct
  189  unbecoming,” and
  190         WHEREAS, in November 2015, Ms. Ermini filed suit against
  191  LCSO and the individual deputies involved in the call, and
  192         WHEREAS, on January 12, 2018, after a four-day trial, a
  193  jury that included a retired law enforcement officer awarded $1
  194  million dollars in damages to Ms. Ermini for her pain and
  195  suffering, and
  196         WHEREAS, after apportionment of 75 percent of the fault to
  197  LCSO, a judgment was entered in Ms. Ermini’s favor for $750,000,
  198  and
  199         WHEREAS, ultimately, after numerous procedural attempts by
  200  LCSO to overturn the judgment, the United States Court of
  201  Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the
  202  United States District Court in Ms. Ermini’s favor, and on or
  203  about December 9, 2019, the Florida Sheriffs Self Insurance
  204  Fund, on behalf of its insured, the Lee County Sheriff’s Office,
  205  paid the statutory limit of $200,000 in damages under section
  206  768.28, Florida Statutes, and
  207         WHEREAS, this claim bill is for recovery of the excess
  208  judgment in the amount of $550,000, plus interest and taxable
  209  trial costs and appellate costs awarded to Ms. Ermini in the
  210  amount of $76,769.93, for a total claim of $626,769.93, NOW,
  211  THEREFORE,
  212  
  213  Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
  214  
  215         Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act are
  216  found and declared to be true.
  217         Section 2. The Florida Sheriffs Risk Management Fund is
  218  authorized and directed to appropriate from funds not otherwise
  219  encumbered and to draw a warrant in the sum of $626,769.93
  220  payable to Patricia Ermini as compensation for injuries and
  221  damages sustained.
  222         Section 3. The amount paid by the Florida Sheriffs Self
  223  Insurance Fund, on behalf of its insured, the Lee County
  224  Sheriff’s Office, pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and
  225  the amount awarded under this act are intended to provide the
  226  sole compensation for all present and future claims arising out
  227  of the factual situation described in this act which resulted in
  228  injuries and damages to Patricia Ermini. The total amount paid
  229  for attorney fees relating to this claim may not exceed 25
  230  percent of the total amount awarded under this act.
  231         Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.